\begin{table}%t4
\caption{\label{table: efficiency}Percentage of resonant asteroids in the local background identified as family members by the classical method (CHCM), the ``standard'' frequency method (FHCM), and the new distance metrics
introduced in this article (AHCM).}
\par
%\centering
\small
\begin{tabular}{ccccc}
\hline\hline
Family name & Resonant argument        & CHCM & FHCM & AHCM \\
\hline
 Erigone    & $2{\nu}_6+{\nu}_{16}$    &  1.5 & 2.2  & 3.3  \\
 Elektra    & $3{\nu}_6+{\nu}_{16}$    &  2.2 & 4.8  & 7.8  \\
 Phocaea    & ${\nu}_6-{\nu}_{16}$     & 34.4 & 34.4 & 47.7 \\
 Baptistina & ${\nu}_{17}+{\nu}_4+{\nu}_5-2{\nu}_6$ & 1.2 & N/A & 5.2 \\
 Vesta      & $3{\nu}_{16}-{\nu}_{17}$ & 12.9 & 13.1 & 22.7 \\
 Vesta      & $3{\nu}_6-{\nu}_5$       &  3.6 & 1.9  & 5.7  \\ 
 Vesta      & $2{\nu}_6-{\nu}_5$       &  0.0 & 0.0  & 0.2  \\ 
\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{table}