![]() |
Figure 1:
Overview of the transmission spectra of a) talc, b) picrolite,
c) montmorillonite, and d) chamosite in the 25-110 ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 2:
Mass absorption coefficient in the FIR range
for talc at different temperatures. The data have been measured
at an enhanced powder concentration of 1:10. Note the change in
width and band position of the ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 3:
Mass absorption coefficient spectra showing the ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 4: Mass absorption coefficient spectra of the montmorillonite sample in the FIR range. The inset displays the 10 K spectrum again on a linear scale to emphasize the individual absorption bands. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 5:
Combined transmission spectrum of chamosite particles embedded in
a KBr and a PE pellet at an identical column density of 0.3 mg/cm2. The
spectra were merged at 16.7 ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 6:
Mass absorption coefficient spectra of the chamosite sample
in the FIR range. The spectra are a combinations of measurements at
two different column densities (see text). The fringes in the
original data have been removed by a sliding average method used
up to a wavelength of about 200 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 7:
Comparison of the mass absorption coefficients of three of the
hydrous silicates measured at 10 K. Picrolite is not shown because the
pellet cooled to 10 K had too low a column density to allow a derivation
of the low (comparable to talc at room temperature) continuum absorption
values. Picrolite has its longest wavelength band at 76 ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 8:
The ISO spectrum of HD 142527 (solid lines) compared to the
emission spectra of cold montmorillonite (dashed line) and talc dust
(dotted line). The latter have been calculated by multiplying the mass
absorption coefficients ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |