Table 3: Numbers of CN candidates located bottom of the bulge, top of the bulge, and bottom-to-top ratio (BTR), within 90 $^{\prime \prime }$ , 150 $^{\prime \prime }$ , and 210 $^{\prime \prime }$ , respectively, of the nucleus of M 81 from this work, Shara et al. (1999), and Neill & Shara (2004). See text for details.
$d \leq 90\hbox{$^{\prime\prime}$ }$ $d \leq 150\hbox{$^{\prime\prime}$ }$ $d \leq 210\hbox{$^{\prime\prime}$ }$

Bottom Top BTR Bottom Top BTR Bottom Top BTR

This work, uncorrected 16.0 16.0 1.00 21.0 22.0 0.95 25.0 27.0 0.93

This work, corrected for effective coverage 16.2 16.2 1.00 21.3 22.3 0.96 25.3 27.4 0.92

Shara et al. (1999) 1.0 1.0 1.00 4.0 4.0 1.00 9.0 5.0 1.80

Neill & Shara (2004) 2.0 4.0 0.50 2.0 8.0 0.25 3.0 8.0 0.38

**Table 3:** Numbers of CN candidates located bottom of the bulge, top of the bulge, and bottom-to-top ratio (BTR), within 90 $^{\prime \prime }$ , 150 $^{\prime \prime }$ , and 210 $^{\prime \prime }$ , respectively, of the nucleus of M 81 from this work, Shara et al. (1999), and Neill & Shara (2004). See text for details.
		$d \leq 90\hbox{$^{\prime\prime}$ }$			$d \leq 150\hbox{$^{\prime\prime}$ }$			$d \leq 210\hbox{$^{\prime\prime}$ }$
	Bottom	Top	BTR	Bottom	Top	BTR	Bottom	Top	BTR
This work, uncorrected	16.0	16.0	1.00	21.0	22.0	0.95	25.0	27.0	0.93
This work, corrected for effective coverage	16.2	16.2	1.00	21.3	22.3	0.96	25.3	27.4	0.92
Shara et al. (1999)	1.0	1.0	1.00	4.0	4.0	1.00	9.0	5.0	1.80
Neill & Shara (2004)	2.0	4.0	0.50	2.0	8.0	0.25	3.0	8.0	0.38

Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text