![]() |
Figure 1: Observed colour-magnitude diagram of NGC 6397. The targets selected for the spectroscopic study are marked with black squares. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 2:
The best-fit H![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 3:
Comparison between our H![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 4:
Comparison between our spectroscopic
![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 5: A selected part of two observed, normalised spectra (dotted lines) and the best fitting model spectra (solid lines), as determined by the analysis code. Note that the models in this figure only contain the spectral lines that are used in the abundance analysis. These lines are marked with labels. The top spectrum belongs to the bRGB star 23 267 and the bottom plot to the TO star 12318. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 6: A histogram of the slopes obtained for linear fits of iron abundance with excitation potential of Fe I lines. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 7:
Abundance trends (filled dots) with effective temperature for Mg, Ca, Ti, and Fe from analysis of 116 stars. The thick lines display general trends and the thin lines show estimated 1![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 8: The figure shows a comparison between equivalent widths measured for the same lines in spectra of the same stars, obtained with GIRAFFE and UVES, respectively. The filled circles corresponds to stars located at the TO and the open circles to bRGB stars. The dashed line mark 1:1 agreement and the solid line is a linear fit to the measurements. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 9:
Comparison between the abundance trends from Fig. 7 (here displayed with black dots) and the predictions from stellar structure models including atomic diffusion and turbulent mixing. The horizontal, black, solid lines represent the initial abundances of the models. The three arrows in the upper left corner of each plot indicate the abundance change at
![]() |
Open with DEXTER |