Table 2: Results for the observations which showed the highest values of $\chi ^{2}_{\mu }$ . Each observation is given a case number (column one) and the observation identification number is shown in column two. We give the date, the exposure time (Exp.), the degrees of freedom ( $\nu$ ) after any flare-filtering, the $\chi ^{2}_{\mu }$ value and then state the ratio between the $\chi ^{2}$ value of the line lightcurve and that of the continuum lightcurve ( $R_{\chi }$ ). We also state the average Fin/Fout (FF) ratio (and error on this value) between the MOS1 and MOS2. The final column gives a comment about the observation as described in the text.
Case Observation Date Exp. $\nu$ $\chi ^{2}_{\mu }$ $R_{\chi }$ FF Err. FF Comment

(ks) linfit ratio ratio

1 0085150301 2001-10-21 31.96 25 25.31 5.98 1.806 0.09 Strong case SWCX

2 0093552701 2001-01-28 24.17 16 22.97 6.09 1.486 0.09 Weak case SWCX

3 0149630301 2003-09-16 19.77 16 16.15 9.47 1.066 0.06 Strong SWCX

4 0305920601 2005-06-23 15.24 14 15.01 17.77 1.226 0.07 Strong SWCX

5 0150680101 2003-07-26 42.67 30 11.39 3.93 1.274 0.06 Strong SWCX

6 0101040301 2000-11-28 37.21 35 9.86 4.06 1.655 0.07 Weak case SWCX

7 0111550401 2001-06-01 93.37 83 8.53 5.36 1.339 0.04 Snowden et al. (2004)

8 0302310501 2005-10-23 23.16 23 7.21 0.47 2.535 0.12 Low $R_{\chi }$

9 0127921101 2000-07-23 7.43 6 5.70 8.97 1.310 0.12 Kuntz & Snowden (2008)

10 0070340501 2001-06-18 19.10 8 5.43 1.85 1.760 0.14 Weak case SWCX

11 0202370301 2005-01-08 25.85 14 4.85 1.19 1.202 0.07 Low $R_{\chi }$

12 0127921001 2000-07-21 54.04 53 4.73 1.93 1.660 0.07 Kuntz & Snowden (2008)

13 0202610801 2004-11-09 17.90 15 4.68 1.75 1.378 0.08 No SWCX

14 0136000101 2002-04-17 17.75 17 4.12 1.56 1.570 0.09 Strong case SWCX

15 0150480501 2002-12-22 21.93 11 3.82 0.75 1.467 0.11 Low $R_{\chi }$

16 0112580601 2000-07-26 33.66 32 3.80 1.95 2.171 0.11 No SWCX

17 0101440101 2000-09-05 49.22 31 3.45 1.56 1.534 0.07 Weak case SWCX

18 0305560101 2005-10-21 23.01 22 3.39 1.67 1.755 0.09 No SWCX

19 0001930301 2001-12-28 24.58 18 3.21 1.37 2.010 0.10 No SWCX

20 0125920201 2000-06-05 23.45 22 2.97 0.48 1.389 0.10 Low $R_{\chi }$

21 0135745801 2002-09-29 13.16 12 2.96 2.30 1.162 0.08 No SWCX

22 0089370501 2002-10-01 49.23 22 2.90 1.40 1.143 0.06 No SWCX

23 0113050501 2001-12-23 25.64 19 2.84 0.91 1.216 0.06 Low $R_{\chi }$

24 0147511101 2002-10-23 97.33 31 2.75 0.68 1.373 0.06 Low $R_{\chi }$ & bad flaring

25 0164560701 2004-07-23 31.62 20 2.74 1.53 1.520 0.07 Weak case SWCX

26 0099760201 2000-03-22 49.34 35 2.69 0.74 1.436 0.06 Low $R_{\chi }$

27 0085150201 2001-10-21 37.33 21 2.43 0.25 1.834 0.09 Low $R_{\chi }$

28 0106460101 2000-11-06 54.90 43 2.41 1.06 1.308 0.06 Weak case SWCX

29 0000110101 2001-08-19 24.00 9 2.31 0.83 1.355 0.09 Low $R_{\chi }$

30 0205970201 2004-09-20 48.14 35 2.24 0.42 1.466 0.06 Low $R_{\chi }$ & bad flaring

**Table 2:** Results for the observations which showed the highest values of $\chi ^{2}_{\mu }$ . Each observation is given a case number (column one) and the observation identification number is shown in column two. We give the date, the exposure time (Exp.), the degrees of freedom ( $\nu$ ) after any flare-filtering, the $\chi ^{2}_{\mu }$ value and then state the ratio between the $\chi ^{2}$ value of the line lightcurve and that of the continuum lightcurve ( $R_{\chi }$ ). We also state the average Fin/Fout (FF) ratio (and error on this value) between the MOS1 and MOS2. The final column gives a comment about the observation as described in the text.
Case	Observation	Date	Exp.	$\nu$	$\chi ^{2}_{\mu }$	$R_{\chi }$	FF	Err. FF	Comment
			(ks)		linfit		ratio	ratio
1	0085150301	2001-10-21	31.96	25	25.31	5.98	1.806	0.09	Strong case SWCX
2	0093552701	2001-01-28	24.17	16	22.97	6.09	1.486	0.09	Weak case SWCX
3	0149630301	2003-09-16	19.77	16	16.15	9.47	1.066	0.06	Strong SWCX
4	0305920601	2005-06-23	15.24	14	15.01	17.77	1.226	0.07	Strong SWCX
5	0150680101	2003-07-26	42.67	30	11.39	3.93	1.274	0.06	Strong SWCX
6	0101040301	2000-11-28	37.21	35	9.86	4.06	1.655	0.07	Weak case SWCX
7	0111550401	2001-06-01	93.37	83	8.53	5.36	1.339	0.04	Snowden et al. (2004)
8	0302310501	2005-10-23	23.16	23	7.21	0.47	2.535	0.12	Low $R_{\chi }$
9	0127921101	2000-07-23	7.43	6	5.70	8.97	1.310	0.12	Kuntz & Snowden (2008)
10	0070340501	2001-06-18	19.10	8	5.43	1.85	1.760	0.14	Weak case SWCX
11	0202370301	2005-01-08	25.85	14	4.85	1.19	1.202	0.07	Low $R_{\chi }$
12	0127921001	2000-07-21	54.04	53	4.73	1.93	1.660	0.07	Kuntz & Snowden (2008)
13	0202610801	2004-11-09	17.90	15	4.68	1.75	1.378	0.08	No SWCX
14	0136000101	2002-04-17	17.75	17	4.12	1.56	1.570	0.09	Strong case SWCX
15	0150480501	2002-12-22	21.93	11	3.82	0.75	1.467	0.11	Low $R_{\chi }$
16	0112580601	2000-07-26	33.66	32	3.80	1.95	2.171	0.11	No SWCX
17	0101440101	2000-09-05	49.22	31	3.45	1.56	1.534	0.07	Weak case SWCX
18	0305560101	2005-10-21	23.01	22	3.39	1.67	1.755	0.09	No SWCX
19	0001930301	2001-12-28	24.58	18	3.21	1.37	2.010	0.10	No SWCX
20	0125920201	2000-06-05	23.45	22	2.97	0.48	1.389	0.10	Low $R_{\chi }$
21	0135745801	2002-09-29	13.16	12	2.96	2.30	1.162	0.08	No SWCX
22	0089370501	2002-10-01	49.23	22	2.90	1.40	1.143	0.06	No SWCX
23	0113050501	2001-12-23	25.64	19	2.84	0.91	1.216	0.06	Low $R_{\chi }$
24	0147511101	2002-10-23	97.33	31	2.75	0.68	1.373	0.06	Low $R_{\chi }$ & bad flaring
25	0164560701	2004-07-23	31.62	20	2.74	1.53	1.520	0.07	Weak case SWCX
26	0099760201	2000-03-22	49.34	35	2.69	0.74	1.436	0.06	Low $R_{\chi }$
27	0085150201	2001-10-21	37.33	21	2.43	0.25	1.834	0.09	Low $R_{\chi }$
28	0106460101	2000-11-06	54.90	43	2.41	1.06	1.308	0.06	Weak case SWCX
29	0000110101	2001-08-19	24.00	9	2.31	0.83	1.355	0.09	Low $R_{\chi }$
30	0205970201	2004-09-20	48.14	35	2.24	0.42	1.466	0.06	Low $R_{\chi }$ & bad flaring

Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text