![]() |
Figure 1:
The top figure is the longitude profile of all photon counts observed
by EGRET above 100 MeV at all latitudes (black error bars), compared with the diffuse counts
predicted by the 3EG model (blue curve) and the Ring model (red curve).
The bottom figure is the residual expressed in number of standard deviation, colors are the
same as above, we added the Galprop residuals in purple. Counts from bright sources have been added to
the diffuse component. For more visibility the plot are presented with a
binning of 4![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 2:
Map in Galactic coordinates of the residuals (expressed
in
![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 3: An example of the iterative source detection with the 2D binned likelihood around Geminga at energies above 100 MeV. 4 consecutive TS maps are shown. Sources are detected, then are included in the background for the next step until no significant one is left. The colourbar gives TS. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 4: Spatial distribution, in Galactic coordinates, of the EGR sources. The confused sources are marked as open circles. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 5: Spatial distribution, in Galactic coordinates, of the 3EG sources. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 6: Spatial distribution, in Galactic coordinates, of the 3EG sources with no counterpart in EGR: the unidentified sources as circles and the identified AGN as stars. The filled circles and stars mark the sources that were flagged as extended or confused in the 3EG catalogue. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 7: Spatial distribution, in Galactic coordinates, of the new EGR sources with no 3EG counterpart. The confused sources are marked as open circles. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 8:
Second stage of the iterative source detection around
Geminga (see Fig. 3) obtained using the 3EG model ( left)
and map of the Ring model intensity divided by the
3EG one ( right). The excess in the TS map assigned in 3EG to the 3EG J0556+0409 point
source corresponds to a local underestimation of the diffuse
emission in the 3EG model. Maps are given in 0.5![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 9:
Histogram of the relative flux differences
![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 10: Histogram of the relative angular separation between the positions found for the EGR and 3EG counterparts in units of the 95% confidence angle for each source. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 11:
Histogram of the relative flux differences
![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 12: Histogram of the relative angular separation between the positions found with the Ring and Galprop models in units of the 95% confidence angle for each source. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 13: The revised EGRET source catalog, shown in Galactic coordinates. The symbols indicate the counterpart types found in the error box: identified pulsars as black squares; other ATNF pulsars as open squares; LSI +61 303, LMC, and solar flare as black triangles; ASDC and CGRaBS blazar candidates as black diamonds; other flat-spectrum radiosources from CRATES as open diamonds; supernova remnants from the Green catalogue as stars; no counterpart as crosses. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 14:
Latitude distribution of the EGR sources with young Galactic sources at
![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 15: TS-map obtained at energies above 1 GeV toward the Galactic centre above the 3EG a) and Ring b) interstellar model |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 16: Likelihood TS contours for energies above 100 MeV and periods incompassing PSR J0030+0451. The cross, the plus sign and the black dot respectively mark the EGR catalog position, the position with maximum likelihood and the pulsar location. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 17: Likelihood TS contours (50%, 68%, 95% and 99% confidence) for energies above 100 MeV and period 5190. The cross is the EGR catalog position, the plus sign the position with maximum likelihood and the black dots mark the radio positions of 3C345, Mrk 501, and 4C+38.41. |
Open with DEXTER |