![]() |
Figure 1:
The combined image of MOS1 and MOS2 of RXC J2228.6+2036 (
![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 2: Upper panel: radial temperature profile of RXC J2228.6+2036. Diamonds: the deprojected temperature and the solid line is the best-fit profile. Stars: for the PSF-corrected temperature (see Sect. 5.1). We offset the stars 5'' to the left so as to illustrate these two kinds of temperature clearly. Bottom panel: radial deprojected abundance of RXC J2228.6+2036. The confidence level is 90%. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 3: The spectra of the central region (r <0.5') for joint fit of pn (bold crosses) and MOS (faint crosses) of RXC J2228.6+2036. a) Fitted by a single-temperature model; b) fitted by a cooling flow model with an isothermal Mekal component. In b) we plot the isothermal and the cooling flow components, and the lower lines below the crosses represent the multiphase components of pn (bold line) and MOS (faint lines), which show that the multiphase components provide only a small contribution to the emission. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 4:
The deprojected electron density profile of RXC J2228.6+2036 after PSF
correction. The error bars are at the 68% confidence level. The solid line
is the best-fit profile from a double-![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 5:
The total mass profile of RXC J2228.6+2036, and the error bars (dotted
lines) are at the 68% confidence level. The vertical line indicates
![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 6:
The gas mass fraction profile of RXC J2228.6+2036. The dashed horizontal
line indicates the WMAP measurement of
![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 7: Redistributions due to the XMM-Newton PSF: the diamonds represent the contribution coming from the bin, the stars from the inner bins and the triangles from the outer bins. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 8: The integrated X-ray pressure profile of RXC J2228.6 +2036 convolved with the PSF of the SZ telescope (the solid line) and compared with the SZ radial profile (the diamonds) derived by Pointecouteau et al. (2002). All errors shown correspond to the 68% confidence level. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 9:
Overestimation factor of the gas density C and underestimation of
the spectroscopic-like temperature versus the mass-weighted temperature R as
a function of the width of a homogeneous temperature distribution in the
presence of pressure equilibrium. The combined effect ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 10:
The entropy distribution of RXC J2228.6+2036. The diamonds represent
the entropy derived from the spectral fitting results and the solid line from
the best-fit T(r) and
![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 11:
Comparison of the present result with the S-T relation of Pratt et
al. (2006). The star indicates the result of RXC J2228.6+2036, and the diamonds
and the best-fit S-T relation line (the solid line) come from Pratt et al.
(2006). Here,
![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 12:
Comparison of the present result with literature M-T relations. The
star indicates the result for RXC J2228.6+2036, the diamonds and their best-fitted
M-T relation line (the solid line) come from Kotov & Vikhlinin (2005), the
triangles and the dashed line from Arnaud et al. (2005), and the dotted line
from Zhang et al. (2008). Here,
![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 13: Comparison of the present result with the L-T relation of Kotov & Vikhlinin (2005). The star indicates the result of RXC J2228.6+2036, and the diamonds and the best-fit L-T relation line (the solid line) come from Kotov & Vikhlinin (2005). The error bars of the star represent the 68% confidence level. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 14:
Comparison of the present result with the M-Y relation of Zhang et
al. (2008) (the solid line), Kravtsov et al. (2006) (the dash-dotted line),
Nagai et al. (2007) (the dashed line), and Arnaud et al. (2007) (the dotted line).
The star indicates the result of RXC J2228.6+2036 with the errors of the 68%
confidence level.
![]() |
Open with DEXTER |