Table 2: Fits to the 0.3-10 keV PDS of NGC 300 X-1 from Obs. 1-4. We give the observation number, as well the best fit spectral index with the $\chi ^2$ /d.o.f.. We also give the $\chi ^2$ /d.o.f. for zero power. Finally we give the fractional r.m.s. variability. We note that the PDS for Obs. 3 is more complex than for the other observations, due to an eclipse.
Obs. $\gamma$ $\chi ^2$ /d.o.f. $\chi ^2$ /d.o.f. (0) Frac. rms (%)

Obs. 1 1.30(12) 17/23 57/25 50(3)

Obs. 2 1.3(2) 27/23 66/25 44(2)

Obs. 3 1.8(2) 56/23 91/25 38(2)

Obs. 4 1.05(11) 23/23 74/23 22(2)

**Table 2:** Fits to the 0.3-10 keV PDS of NGC 300 X-1 from Obs. 1-4. We give the observation number, as well the best fit spectral index with the $\chi ^2$ /d.o.f.. We also give the $\chi ^2$ /d.o.f. for zero power. Finally we give the fractional r.m.s. variability. We note that the PDS for Obs. 3 is more complex than for the other observations, due to an eclipse.
Obs.	$\gamma$	$\chi ^2$ /d.o.f.	$\chi ^2$ /d.o.f. (0)	Frac. rms (%)
Obs. 1	1.30(12)	17/23	57/25	50(3)
Obs. 2	1.3(2)	27/23	66/25	44(2)
Obs. 3	1.8(2)	56/23	91/25	38(2)
Obs. 4	1.05(11)	23/23	74/23	22(2)

Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text