\begin{table}%t2
\caption{Mode height and linewidth parameters for HD 49933, given by
  the \emph{Reference} fits. Values are relevant to $l=0$.  Data
  marked with filled circles indicate where at least six of the seven
  fitters agreed on the value of the parameter to within
  $1\sigma$. Details are given in those cases where disagreement was
  noted at $>$$1\sigma$.  The mode heights are typically underestimated by about 5\% due to the interpolation of the gaps.}
\label{table_hg}      
%\centering
\par
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c c}     
\hline\hline       
Degree & Order& Mode height $H$ & Uncertainty & Linewidth $\Gamma$& Uncertainty &Agreement & Disagreement\\ 
& &(in ppm$^2/\mu$Hz) &(in ppm$^2/\mu$Hz)& (in $\mu$Hz)&(in $\mu$Hz)&$<$$1$$\sigma$& value\\
\hline                    
0 & 	14&0.55	&+0.30 / $-0.20$ 	&4.18		& +2.80 / $-1.68$ 	& $\bullet$ 	&\\
0&	15&1.05	&+0.44 / $-0.31$	&1.03		& +0.14 / $-0.12$ 	&			&$>$$2.5 \sigma$ on $\log \Gamma, H$\\
0&	16&1.46	&+0.84 / $-0.53$	&1.31		&+0.71 / $-0.46$ 	&$\bullet$		&\\	
0&	17&1.37	&+0.85 / $-0.53$	&1.04		&+0.67 / $-0.41$&	&$>$$2.5 \sigma$ on $\log \Gamma, H$\\
0&	18&2.20	&+1.04 / $-0.71$	&1.23		&+0.52 / $-0.37$&$\bullet$	&\\
0&	19&0.92	&+0.39 / $-0.28$	&3.46		&+1.55 / $-1.07$&$\bullet$	&\\
0&	20&0.67	&+0.17 / $-0.14$	&6.71		&+1.62 / $-1.31$&$\bullet$	&\\
0&	21&0.90	&+0.39 / $-0.27$	&3.03		&+1.30 / $-0.91$&$\bullet$	&\\
0&	22&0.36	&+0.15 / $-0.11$	&5.72		&+2.56 / $-1.77$&$\bullet$	&\\
0&	23&0.45	&+0.18 / $-0.13$	&4.71		&+1.86 / $-1.33$&$\bullet$	&\\
0&	24&0.38	&+0.37 / $-0.19$	&3.85		&+4.61 / $-2.10$&	$\bullet$			&\\
0&	25&1.00	&+0.06 / $-0.06$	&0.97		&+0.27 / $-1.26$&	&$>$$7.0 \sigma$ on $\log \Gamma, H$\\
0&	26&0.39	&+0.21 / $-0.14$	&3.40		&+2.01 / $-1.26$&$\bullet$&\\
0&	27&0.33	&+0.52 / $-0.20$	&2.72		&+5.58 / $-1.83$&$\bullet$&\\
\hline 
\end{tabular}
\end{table}