\begin{table}%t3
\caption{Result  of   the  parametric   lens  modeling.}\label{mod}
\par
%\centering
\small 
  \begin{tabular}{lc|ccccccl} 
  \hline \hline 
%&&&&&&&& \\[-8pt]
  Name  & Comp.  & Mass & $e$, $\theta_e$ & $\gamma$, $\theta_{\gamma}$ & \#d.o.f. & $\chi^2$ & $h$
  & Comments\\
\hline
 SIE+$\gamma$ &  & $b=0.96$ & 0.21, (20.8) & 0.187, 7.4  & 1 & 15.3 &  --   &  Time delays not used\\ 
 SIE+$\gamma$ &  & $b=0.94$ & 0.13, (30.5) & 0.063, 24.6 & 2 & 3.6  & $\rm 0.79^{+0.04}_{-0.02}$ & $G_{\rm group}$ included \\ 
 SIE+$\gamma$ &  & $b=0.97$ & 0.16, 84.4   & 0.059, 46.9 & 1 & 0.30 & $\rm 0.63^{+0.07}_{-0.03}$ & $G_{\rm group}$ included  \\ 
 dVC+$\gamma$ &  & $b=2.71$ & 0.20, (20.1) & 0.305, 9.7  & 1 & 34.4 &  --   &  Time delays not used\\
 dVC+$\gamma$ &  & $b=2.83$ & 0.18,  83.1  & 0.116, 64.5 & 1 & 0.01 & $\rm 0.92^{+0.06}_{-0.03}$ & $G_{\rm group}$ included    \\
 NFW+$\gamma$ &  & $\kappa_{\rm s}=0.20$ & 0.16, (27.4) & 0.070, --3.6 & 1 & 0.38 & -- & $r_{\rm s}=10\arcsec$ (fixed); time delays not used\\
 NFW+$\gamma$ &  & $\kappa_{\rm s}=0.21$ & 0.15, 85.7 & 0.079, 9.5 & 1 & 0.06 & $\rm 0.29^{+0.03}_{-0.03}$ & $r_{\rm s}=10\arcsec$ (fixed); $G_{\rm group}$ included\\
 NFW+$\gamma$ &  & $\kappa_{\rm s}=0.09$ & 0.15, 85.4 & 0.076, 30.6 & 1 & 0.01 & $\rm 0.63^{+0.10}_{-0.08}$ & $r_{\rm s}=1\arcsec$ (fixed); $G_{\rm group}$ included\\
 dVC+NFW+$\gamma$& Light & $b=1.56$ & (0.17), (29.3) & 0.057, 37.0 & -- & --  & --  & $R_{\rm e}=0.608$\arcsec (fixed)\\ 
                 & Halo  & $\kappa_{\rm s}=0.082$ & 0.065, (29.3) &   & 1 & 6.33 & $\rm 0.78^{+0.12}_{-0.10}$ & $r_{\rm s}=10\arcsec$ (fixed); $G_{\rm group}$ included\\ 
dVC+NFW+$\gamma$ & Light & $b=1.53$ & (0.16), (26.4) & 0.075, 27.5 & -- & --  & --  & same model as above, with\\ 
                 & Halo & $\kappa_{\rm s}=0.10$ & 0.43, 89.8 &   & 3 & 3.2 & $\rm 0.69^{+0.20}_{-0.10}$ & flux ratios included \\ 
\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{table}