\begin{table}%t6
\caption{Summary of results from dust continuum emission modeling (above mid-line) and from molecular line emission modeling (below mid-line).
The relative uncertainties are at the 3$\sigma$ level, and they\protect correspond
to the rms noise propagated through the modeling process.}
\label{tab:summary}
%\begin{center}
\par
	\begin{tabular}{l|cc}
	\hline\hline
	~ 					& MM1 							& MM2 \\
	\hline
\par
	$L$					& 14~000~\lsol						& 2~700~\lsol \\
	$T_*$					& 22~500~K						& 16~600~K \\
	$M_{\rm gas}$				& $660\pm 130$~\msol						& $460 \pm 100$~\msol \\
	$r_{\rm ext}$				& 27~300~AU						& 21~600~AU \\
	$n_0$				& $2.8~(0.6)$~$\times$~10$^{9}$~cm$^{-3}$		& $1.1~(0.2)$~$\times$~10$^{10}$~cm$^{-3}$ \\
	$\left<n\right>$			& $8.0~(2.0)$~$\times$~10$^{5}$~cm$^{-3}$		& $1.1~(0.2)$~$\times$~10$^{6}$~cm$^{-3}$ \\
	$p$						& --1.2~$^a$					& --1.3~$^a$ \\
	$T_{\rm ext}$				& $25.4~(0.5)$~K			& 19.2~(0.4)~K \\
	$\left<T\right>$			& $27.3~(0.2)$~K			& 19.4~(0.2)~K \\
	$\alpha$					& $-0.588~(0.011)$			& --0.614~(0.012) \\
	$\beta$					& $3.95~(0.03)$				& $3.85~(0.04)$ \\
	$r_{\rm in}$					& 21~(2)~AU				& 12~(1)~AU \\
	\hline
\par
	$\varv_{\rm T}$			& $1.0~(0.1)$~\kms					& $1.7~(0.1)$~\kms \\
	$X$(CS)				& $1.0~(0.3)$~$\times$~10$^{-9}$	& $5.4~(1.5)$~$\times$~10$^{-10}$ \\
	$X$(C$^{34}$S)		& $5.1~(1.4)$~$\times$~10$^{-11}$	& $2.7~(0.8)$~$\times$~10$^{-11}$\\
	$X$(N$_2$H$^+$)		& 3.5~(0.8)~$\times$~10$^{-10}$		& 6.3~(1.4)~$\times$~10$^{-10}$\\
	$X$(HCO$^+$)			& 2.3~(0.7)~$\times$~10$^{-9}$		& 5.1~(1.6)~$\times$~10$^{-9}$\\
	$X$(H$^{13}$CO$^+$) 	& 3.4~(1.1)~$\times$~10$^{-11}$		& 7.6~(2.4)~$\times$~10$^{-11}$\\
	$X$(p-H$_2$CO)	& 1.5~(0.4)~$\times$~10$^{-10}$		& 2.6~(0.7)--4.8(1.3)~$\times$~10$^{-10}$\\
	$X$(o-H$_2$CO)	& 1.3~(0.4)~$\times$~10$^{-10}$		& 2.0~(0.6)~$\times$~10$^{-10}$\\
	{}[para/ortho]  		& $\simeq$1.2						& $\simeq$1.3--2.4 \\	\hline
	\multicolumn{3}{c}{} \\
	\end{tabular}\\
	$^a$ Values from continuum map analysis by \citet{beuther2002a}.
%\end{center}
\par
\end{table}