Table 2: Parameters quantifying the irregularity of the gas kinematics measured for our sample.
ID $R_{\rm max}$ $\sigma _{\rm PA}$ $\Delta \phi $ k3,5/k1
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
C7 13.8 23 68 $\pm$ 26 0.32 $\pm$ 0.20
C8 20.9 2 9 $\pm$ 6 0.06 $\pm$ 0.05
C9 9.2 19 66 $\pm$ 20 0.10 $\pm$ 0.03
C10 11.7 9 14 $\pm$ 9 0.26 $\pm$ 0.08
F2 10.5 2 35 $\pm$ 37 0.08 $\pm$ 0.02
F3 10.0 7 39 $\pm$ 9 0.07 $\pm$ 0.05
F4 5.5 21 18 $\pm$ 20 0.30 $\pm$ 0.19
F5 11.3 5 46 $\pm$ 9 0.08 $\pm$ 0.03
F6 4.4 29 57 $\pm$ 44 0.27 $\pm$ 0.18
F7 14.1 3 0 $\pm$ 11 0.05 $\pm$ 0.02
F10 8.4 8 1 $\pm$ 7 0.25 $\pm$ 0.05
F11 1 $.\!\!^{\prime\prime}$7 5 18 $\pm$ 5 0.05 $\pm$ 0.02
Column (1): object ID; Col. (2): maximum radius for which kinematic parameters could be calculated. The conversion from arcsecond into kpc was done as explained in Wright (2006); Col. (3): standard deviation of the kinematic position angle ( $\sigma _{\rm PA}$); Col. (4): mean misalignment between the kinematic and photometric position angles ( $\Delta \phi $); Col. (5): mean k3,5/k1 of the analysis done while fixing the position angle and the ellipticity to their global values.
For galaxy F11, only the photometric redshift is available. Since photometric redshifts have big uncertainties, we give $R_{\rm max}$ of this galaxy in arcseconds. k3,5/k1 of galaxy F5, $\Delta \phi $ of the galaxies that have $\epsilon \leq 0.1$ (galaxy F2) and all parameters for galaxy F10 are rather meaningless as explained in Sect. 4.1. Therefore they are excluded from the analysis.

Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text