Table 3: Models results for candidate ZAMS sources in the field.
Sou. $M_{\star}$ $T_{\star}$ $R_{\star}$ $R_{\rm Disk}$ i $A_{\rm V}$ $L_{\rm bol}^a$ Log[ $N_{\rm Ly}$ ] G₀

[ $M_{\odot}$ ] [K] [ $R_{\odot}$ ] [AU] [ $^{\circ}$ ] [mag] $L_{\odot}$ [s^-1]

B 11.4 27 500 4.3 380 87 15.5 9400 46.3 200

C 9.7 25 300 3.9 2000 70 11.5 5600 45.8 120

D 10.0 25 600 4.0 660 87 7.3 6400 45.9 135

H 6.0 18 400 2.9 410 87 0.0 900 43.4 10

I 9.2 24 500 3.8 120 70 6.2 4700 45.8 50

**Table 3:** Models results for candidate ZAMS sources in the field.
Sou.	$M_{\star}$	$T_{\star}$	$R_{\star}$	$R_{\rm Disk}$	i	$A_{\rm V}$	$L_{\rm bol}^a$	Log[ $N_{\rm Ly}$ ]	G₀
	[ $M_{\odot}$ ]	[K]	[ $R_{\odot}$ ]	[AU]	[ $^{\circ}$ ]	[mag]	$L_{\odot}$	[s^-1]
B	11.4	27 500	4.3	380	87	15.5	9400	46.3	200
C	9.7	25 300	3.9	2000	70	11.5	5600	45.8	120
D	10.0	25 600	4.0	660	87	7.3	6400	45.9	135
H	6.0	18 400	2.9	410	87	0.0	900	43.4	10
I	9.2	24 500	3.8	120	70	6.2	4700	45.8	50

^a As given by the models.

Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text