\begin{table}%T1%t3
\caption{Summary of the observing log.}\label{tab2}
\small%\centerline
 {
\begin{tabular}{llcccllcccclcc} 
\hline \hline
Object& Class & $r$ [AU]& $\Delta$ [AU]& $\alpha$ $[^{\circ}]$ & Mode$\dagger$&Date&UT & $T_{\rm exp}$ (s)  &Airm.&Seeing ($''$)&Solar An. (airm.)&$S$ (\% (0.1~$\mu$m)$^{-1}$)&$D_{0.8}$ (\%)$\bullet$\\
\hline
10~199 Chariklo 			& Cen & 13.276 & 12.496 & 2.8&S &20 Mar. 2007 & 05:52 & 2000 & 1.02 & 1.1 & HD 107998  (1.22)&  7.8 $\pm$ 0.5&--1.2\\
26~375 (1999 DE$_9$)   		& Res & 35.435 & 34.767 & 1.2&V &22 Jan. 2007 & 05:35 & 3600 & 1.31 & 0.8 & SA98978   (1.17)& 22.2 $\pm$ 0.6& 5.6\\
28~978 Ixion 			& Res & 42.019 & 41.241 & 0.9&S &15 Jul. 2007 & 03:11 & 2400 & 1.09 & 1.1 & HD 174935  (1.18)& 20.0 $\pm$ 0.8&13.3\\     
32~532 Thereus			& Cen & 11.006 & 10.345 & 4.1&V &19 Sep. 2007 & 06:54 & 3600 & 1.24 & 1.4 & SA93101   (1.18)& 12.0 $\pm$ 0.7& 1.3\\     
42~355 Typhon       		& SDO & 17.542 & 16.722 & 1.8&V &24 Jan. 2007 & 05:57 & 3600 & 1.23 & 0.6 & SA1021081 (1.24)& 10.0 $\pm$ 0.6&--0.8\\
47~171 (1999 TC$_{36}$)  	& Res & 30.893 & 30.087 & 1.1&S &09 Nov. 2006 & 01:34 & 1800 & 1.08 & 0.8 & HD 1368    (1.27)& 37.3 $\pm$ 0.7& 9.0\\
47~932 (2000 GN$_{171}$) 	& Res & 28.352 & 28.379 & 2.0&V &23 Jan. 2007 & 07:24 & 4800 & 1.27 & 0.6 & SA1021081 (1.28)& 22.3 $\pm$ 0.7& 2.1\\
47~932 (2000 GN$_{171}$) 	& Res & 28.352 & 28.379 & 2.0&V &24 Jan. 2007 & 07:39 & 4800 & 1.21 & 0.7 & SA1021081 (1.24)& 21.5 $\pm$ 0.7&  \\
47~932 (2000 GN$_{171}$)		& Res & 28.345 & 27.492 & 1.1&S &24 Mar. 2007 & 05:36 & 2400 & 1.05 & 1.1 & HD 107998  (1.22)& 21.8 $\pm$ 0.8& 5.3\\     
50~000 Quaoar			& Cla & 43.267 & 42.449 & 0.8&S &15 Jul. 2007 & 01:56 & 2400 & 1.02 & 1.1 & HD 147284  (1.04)& 28.5 $\pm$ 0.8& 4.4\\     
54~598 Bienor			& Cen & 18.116 & 17.127 & 0.6&V &18 Sep. 2007 & 05:21 & 2800 & 1.31 & 1.1 & SA115271  (1.24)&  8.7 $\pm$ 0.7& 2.8\\     
55~565 (2002 AW$_{197}$) 	& Cla & 46.796 & 45.860 & 0.4&V &23 Jan. 2007 & 05:54 & 3600 & 1.21 & 0.5 & SA98978   (1.22)& 24.8 $\pm$ 0.7& 3.6\\
55~637 (2002 UX$_{25}$)		& Cla & 42.004 & 41.188 & 0.8&V &18 Sep. 2007 & 07:02 & 2000 & 1.23 & 1.6 & SA115271  (1.24)& 18.5 $\pm$ 1.1& 6.7\\     
60~558 Echeclus			& Cen & 12.124 & 11.239 & 2.4&S &14 May 2007 & 01:27 & 2400 & 1.09 & 0.4 & SA107684  (1.43)& 12.5 $\pm$ 0.7& 9.1\\     
83~982 Crantor$\ddagger$		& Cen & 14.739 & 14.007 & 2.9&S &14 Jul. 2007 & 01:57 & 2640 & 1.05 & 0.6 & HD 147284  (1.04)& 38.5 $\pm$ 1.2& 4.2\\     
83~982 Crantor$\ddagger$		& Cen & 14.741 & 14.032 & 2.9&S &16 Jul. 2007 & 01:29 & 2640 & 1.03 & 0.6 & HD 147284  (1.02)& 39.9 $\pm$ 1.3& 4.8\\     
11~9951 (2002 KX$_{14}$)		& Cla & 39.535 & 38.855 & 1.1&S &13 Jul. 2007 & 01:54 & 2640 & 1.04 & 1.4 & HD 147284  (1.03)& 27.1 $\pm$ 1.0& 5.7\\     
120~132 (2003 FY$_{128}$)	& Det & 38.298 & 37.935 & 1.4&V &22 Jan. 2007 & 07:12 & 5050 & 1.15 & 1.2 & SA98978   (1.17)& 21.7 $\pm$ 0.7& 6.3\\
136~199 Eris	  		& Det & 96.849 & 95.890 & 0.2&S &20 Oct. 2006 & 05:07 & 1800 & 1.09 & 0.8 & SA93101   (1.22)&  4.4 $\pm$ 0.7&11.5\\
136~199 Eris			& Det & 96.803 & 95.923 & 0.3&V &19 Sep. 2007 & 05:33 & 3000 & 1.23 & 1.7 & SA93101   (1.18)&  3.8 $\pm$ 0.7&14.3\\     
145~452 (2005 RN$_{43}$)		& Cla & 40.714 & 39.837 & 0.7&V &19 Sep. 2007 & 04:23 & 1400 & 1.27 & 1.2 & SA93101   (1.18)& 23.0 $\pm$ 1.1&11.9\\     
145~453 (2005 RR$_{43}$)		& Cla & 38.492 & 37.968 & 1.3&V &18 Sep. 2007 & 08:05 & 4050 & 1.13 & 1.2 & SA93101   (1.14)&  0.6 $\pm$ 0.7& 4.3\\     
2003 AZ$_{84}$          	& Res & 45.605 & 44.651 & 0.3&V &24 Jan. 2007 & 04:02 & 3600 & 1.29 & 0.7 & SA1021081 (1.28)&  3.0 $\pm$ 0.6&--7.0\\
2003 QW$_{90}$          	& Cla & 44.227 & 43.517 & 0.9&S &09 Nov. 2006 & 03:07 & 1800 & 1.21 & 1.2 & HD 1368    (1.27)& 34.8 $\pm$ 1.0& 5.2\\
2003 UZ$_{117}$         	& Cla & 39.529 & 38.866 & 1.1&S &25 Dec. 2006 & 03:02 & 1800 & 1.29 & 1.4 & SA93101   (1.37)&  1.5 $\pm$ 0.7& 0.9\\
\hline
\end{tabular}}
\medskip
$\dagger$ V~= Visitor, S~= Service.
$\bullet$~Departure from linearity of the spectra.
$\ddagger$~The two spectra of this object are very similar both in shape and slope. As the rotational period reported for this object is ambiguous, it is not possible to make a confident comparison between the rotational phases of each observation.
\end{table}