![]() |
Figure 1: Selection of the stable lines from the list provided by Sousa et al. (2007). We present the mean difference between each line abundance and the mean abundance of the respective star as a function of the wavelength. We divided the analysis into three different ranges of effective temperatures. The dashed lines represent the 1.5 sigma threshold. Lines in the shaded area (<4500 Å) were also removed since this region was strongly affected by blending effects, in particular for cooler stars. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 2:
In the top panel, we show the distribution of the sample stars in the H-R diagram. The filled circles represent the planet hosts in our sample. We also plot some evolutionary tracks computed with CESAM for a 1.0, 1.1 and 1.2 ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 3: Comparison of our spectroscopic results for the effective temperature with other values found in the literature. We also show the comparison with IRFM using either the Kurucz or Phoenix models. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 4: Comparison of our spectroscopic results for surface gravity with other measurements in the literature. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 5: Comparison of our spectroscopic measurements of [Fe/H] to others found in the literature. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 6: Calibration of the effective temperature as a function of the color index B-V and [Fe/H]. The 3 fitted lines correspond to lines with constant values of [Fe/H] (-0.5, 0.0, 0.5). |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 7: Metallicity distribution of jovian planet hosts and neptunian planet hosts within the HARPS GTO ``high precision'' spectroscopic catalogue. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 8: Metallicity distribution for the sample presented in this work (dotted line), for stars hosting neptunian planets (dashed line), and for stars exclusively hosting neptunian planets (full line). The mean metallicity of each distribution is indicated on the plot. |
Open with DEXTER |