![]() |
Figure 1: A fragment of the CFHT Megacam r'-band image, showing the central part of Abell 496. Galaxies from the spectroscopic sample are displayed with different symbols: (1) confirmed cluster members as diamonds with the colour indicating the presence of embedded structures: red, green, and blue for no, weak, and strong embedded structures respectively; (2) confirmed field galaxies as squares; (3) galaxies with unknown redshifts as triangles. The X-ray map obtained with XMM-Newton is shown as contours. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 2: Absolute B magnitude ( top panel) and effective radius ( bottom panel, cf. Kormendy relation) as a function of mean surface brightness within the effective radius. Giant and intermediate-luminosity ellipticals, power-law and core galaxies are shown in blue, bulges of disc galaxies in red, dwarf ellipticals and lenticulars in black. We keep the original morphological classification (E/dE) for the data points coming from the Virgo Cluster ACS Survey, and from Caon et al. (1993), and D'Onofrio et al. (1994). Therefore, they appear both in blue and black. Abell 496 galaxies are shown as filled blue circles with crosses. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 3: Faber-Jackson relation for ellipticals and bulges of disc galaxies. Abell 496 objects are shown as blue-filled circles. Giant and intermediate-luminosity ellipticals are in blue, bulges of disc galaxies in red, dwarf ellipticals and lenticulars in black. The upper end of the arrow representing M 32 corresponds to the HST STIS measurements (Joseph et al. 2001), and the filled circle represents the value obtained from earlier HST FOS data (van der Marel et al. 1998), which was in agreement with more recent ground-based observations. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 4:
Mgb - ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 5:
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 6: Relations between central velocity dispersion and stellar population parameters: SSP-equivalent age ( top), metallicity ( middle), and a combination of these parameters free of the effect of the age-metallicity degeneracy ( bottom). The presence of embedded structures in the galaxies is indicated. Values for early-type galaxies from Sánchez-Blázquez et al. (2006a,b) and measurements for 848 SDSS galaxies are overplotted. Colours are the same as in Fig. 4. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 7: Age and [Mg/Fe] abundance ratios of galaxies as a function of projected distance to the cluster centre. Only galaxies having uncertainties on [Mg/Fe] determinations better than 0.1 dex are shown in the bottom panel. The remaining galaxies are shown in blue in the top panel. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 8:
1-![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure A.1:
ACO496J043306.97-131238.8 (G-01). a) CFHT Megacam r'-band image;
b) result of unsharp masking; c-e) adaptively binned colour maps;
f) spectrum (black) and ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure A.2: ACO496J043308.85-130235.6 (G-02). The same as in Fig. A.1. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure A.3: ACO496J043312.08-130449.3 (G-03). The same as in Fig. A.1. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure A.4: ACO496J043317.75-131536.6 (G-04). The same as in Fig. A.1. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure A.5: ACO496J043318.95-131726.9 (G-05). The same as in Fig. A.1. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure A.6: ACO496J043320.35-130314.9 (G-06). The same as in Fig. A.1. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure A.7: ACO496J043321.37-130416.6 (G-07). The same as in Fig. A.1. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure A.8: ACO496J043324.61-131111.9 (G-08). The same as in Fig. A.1. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure A.9: ACO496J043324.91-131342.6 (G-09). The same as in Fig. A.1. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure A.10: ACO496J043325.10-130906.6 (G-10). The same as in Fig. A.1. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure A.11: ACO496J043325.40-131414.6 (G-11). The same as in Fig. A.1. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure A.12: ACO496J043325.54-130408.0 (G-12). The same as in Fig. A.1. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure A.13: ACO496J043326.49-131717.8 (G-13). The same as in Fig. A.1. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure A.14: ACO496J043329.79-130851.7 (G-14). The same as in Fig. A.1. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure A.15: ACO496J043331.48-131654.6 (G-15). The same as in Fig. A.1. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure A.16: ACO496J043332.07-131518.1 (G-16). The same as in Fig. A.1. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure A.17: ACO496J043333.17-131712.6 (G-17). The same as in Fig. A.1. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure A.18: ACO496J043333.53-131852.6 (G-18). The same as in Fig. A.1. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure A.19: ACO496J043334.54-131137.1 (G-19). The same as in Fig. A.1. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure A.20: ACO496J043337.35-131520.2 (G-20). The same as in Fig. A.1. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure A.21: ACO496J043338.22-131500.7 (G-21). The same as in Fig. A.1. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure A.22: ACO496J043339.07-131319.7 (G-22). The same as in Fig. A.1. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure A.23: ACO496J043339.72-131424.6 (G-23). The same as in Fig. A.1. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure A.24: ACO496J043341.69-131551.8 (G-24). The same as in Fig. A.1. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure A.25: ACO496J043342.10-131653.7 (G-25). The same as in Fig. A.1. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure A.26: ACO496J043342.13-131258.8 (G-26). The same as in Fig. A.1. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure A.27: ACO496J043342.83-130846.8 (G-27). The same as in Fig. A.1. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure A.28: ACO496J043343.04-130514.1 (G-28). The same as in Fig. A.1. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure A.29: ACO496J043343.04-125924.4 (G-29). The same as in Fig. A.1. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure A.30: ACO496J043345.67-130542.2 (G-30). The same as in Fig. A.1. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure A.31: ACO496J043346.71-131756.2 (G-31). The same as in Fig. A.1. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure A.32: ACO496J043348.59-130558.3 (G-32). The same as in Fig. A.1. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure A.33: ACO496J043349.08-130520.5 (G-33). The same as in Fig. A.1. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure A.34: ACO496J043350.17-125945.4 (G-34). The same as in Fig. A.1. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure A.35: ACO496J043351.54-131135.5 (G-35). The same as in Fig. A.1. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure A.36: ACO496J043352.77-131523.8 (G-36). The same as in Fig. A.1. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure A.37: ACO496J043355.55-131024.9 (G-37). The same as in Fig. A.1. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure A.38: ACO496J043356.18-125913.1 (G-38). The same as in Fig. A.1. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure A.39: ACO496J043359.03-130626.7 (G-39). The same as in Fig. A.1. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure A.40: ACO496J043401.57-131359.7 (G-40). The same as in Fig. A.1. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure A.41: ACO496J043403.19-131310.6 (G-41). The same as in Fig. A.1. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure A.42: ACO496J043408.50-131152.7 (G-42). The same as in Fig. A.1. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure A.43: ACO496J043410.60-130756.7 (G-43). The same as in Fig. A.1. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure A.44: ACO496J043413.00-131003.5 (G-44). The same as in Fig. A.1. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure A.45: ACO496J043413.08-131231.6 (G-45). The same as in Fig. A.1. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure A.46: ACO496J043415.37-130823.5 (G-46). The same as in Fig. A.1. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure A.47: ACO496J043411.72-131130.2 (G-A1). The same as panels a- e) in Fig. A.1 |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure A.48: ACO496J043414.54-131303.0 (G-A2). The same as panels a- e) in Fig. A.1. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure B.1:
Residuals of the fitting for a late-type star, an object with
a strong MgH (5208 Å) molecular band. The top panel presents the rest-frame
spectrum of the star (black) and its best fitting PEGASE.HR template for
n=15 (blue), the bottom panel displays the fitting residuals for the three
different multiplicative polynomial continua (
n=3, 9, 15). The visual
scale of the flux axis for the residuals is doubled compared to the top
panel. The 1![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure B.2:
Stability of the estimations of the velocity dispersion ( bottom left),
metallicity ( top right), and age ( bottom right) with respect to the
multiplicative polynomial continuum order (n) for three galaxies with
different stellar populations. ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure B.3:
Residuals of the fitting for G-24, an object with highly
overabundant [![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure B.4: Comparison of SSP ages ( top panel) and combinations of age and metallicity, stable against the age-metallicity degeneracy ( bottom panel), obtained using Lick indices and spectral fitting. Black and red points correspond to the spectral fitting in the two following wavelength ranges respectively: 4100-5800 Å and 4800-5600 Å. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure B.5: Difference of age ( top panel) and metallicity ( bottom panel) determinations from the spectral fitting and Lick indices against [Mg/Fe] abundance ratios. Black and red colours are the same as in Fig. B.4. |
Open with DEXTER |