Table 2: Future LSS surveys characteristics (1) from Refregier et al. (2006, 2008) and the DUNE website; (2) and (3) from Pogosian et al. (2005) as ``conservative'' and ``goal'' cases respectively; (4) from the SNAP collaboration, the SNAP website http://snap.lbl.gov/ and Aldering et al. (2007); (5) from Stubbs et al. (2007), Heavens et al. (2007), and private communications with Phleps. Planck characteristics used for the noise part of the signal-to-noise, and for the Fisher matrices analyses are also given. The values of $z_{\rm med}$ for SNAP and $\bar{N}$ for PanSTARRS are only indicative.
$f_{{\rm sky}}$ $z_{\rm med}$ nbar (arcmin^-2)

DUNE(1) 49% 0.9 40

LSST-1(2) 30% 1 50

LSST-2(3) 49% 1.8 70

SNAP(4) 1 % 1.8 100

PanSTARRS(5) 50% 0.75 5

PLANCK $f_{\rm sky}=80\%$ $\theta_{\rm beam}=7~{\rm arcmin}$ $\omega^{-1}_{\rm T} = 4\rm e^{-17}$

**Table 2:** Future LSS surveys characteristics (1) from Refregier et al. (2006, 2008) and the DUNE website; (2) and (3) from Pogosian et al. (2005) as ``conservative'' and ``goal'' cases respectively; (4) from the SNAP collaboration, the SNAP website http://snap.lbl.gov/ and Aldering et al. (2007); (5) from Stubbs et al. (2007), Heavens et al. (2007), and private communications with Phleps. Planck characteristics used for the noise part of the signal-to-noise, and for the Fisher matrices analyses are also given. The values of $z_{\rm med}$ for SNAP and $\bar{N}$ for PanSTARRS are only indicative.
	$f_{{\rm sky}}$	$z_{\rm med}$	nbar (arcmin^-2)
DUNE(1)	49%	0.9	40
LSST-1(2)	30%	1	50
LSST-2(3)	49%	1.8	70
SNAP(4)	1 %	1.8	100
PanSTARRS(5)	50%	0.75	5
PLANCK	$f_{\rm sky}=80\%$	$\theta_{\rm beam}=7~{\rm arcmin}$	$\omega^{-1}_{\rm T} = 4\rm e^{-17}$

Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text