All Tables

Table 1: CO rotational line profiles as used in this study. Consecutive columns list the transition, the telescope, the half-power beamwidth ( HPBW), the main-beam efficiency ( $\eta _{\rm {MB}}$ ), the absolute flux uncertainty ( $\sigma _{\rm {abs}}$ ), and the literature reference. The beam width, main-beam efficiency, and absolute flux uncertainty listed in this table are the ones as found in the cited paper. In case the absolute flux uncertainty was not given, an uncertainty of 20% is assumed.
Table 2: Power-law dependence of the wavelength-integrated intensity $I_{\rm {CO}}$ on the angular distance $\beta$ for the different scan directions.
Table 3: Parameters of the model with best goodness-of-fit for R Hya. In the second column the values of the best-fit model parameters are listed, in the third column the confidence interval around the parameter is specified. The numbers in italics are input parameters that have been kept fixed at the given values.
Table A.1: Logbook of the CO vibrational-rotational Phoenix observations of R Hya. A notation ``EW-slit N1 E2.5'' indicates a slit-position oriented in the east-west direction, which is 1 $^{\prime \prime }$ offset to the north from the star and which has been moved 2.5 $^{\prime \prime }$ in the east-direction along the slit. For the off-star observations, the number of the data we used is also listed in the first column. $\beta$ Ori is a telluric reference star; the observations of $\alpha$ Vir are used to compute the slit loss (see the paper for more details).