Table A.2: Identified systematic uncertainties that could impact the shift of zero point between the local and the distant smTFRs. Systematic uncertainties on $V_{\rm flat}$ have been converted into $M_{\rm stellar}$ using Eq. (A.1). Negative values tend to reduce the shift of zero point, while positive values have the opposite trend.
Description Bias on $M_{\rm stellar}$ (dex) Comments

Photometry $\sim$ 0 Comparison EIS vs. ACS in the CDFS

M/L_K Evolution with z +0.1 Following Sect. A.3

IMF Evolution with z +0.05 Following van Dokkum (2007)

Velocity correction $\pm$ 0.06 See Sect. 4.2.3

Total -0.06/+0.21

**Table A.2:** Identified systematic uncertainties that could impact the shift of zero point between the local and the distant smTFRs. Systematic uncertainties on $V_{\rm flat}$ have been converted into $M_{\rm stellar}$ using Eq. (A.1). Negative values tend to reduce the shift of zero point, while positive values have the opposite trend.
Description	Bias on $M_{\rm stellar}$ (dex)	Comments
Photometry	$\sim$ 0	Comparison EIS vs. ACS in the CDFS
M/L_K Evolution with z	+0.1	Following Sect. A.3
IMF Evolution with z	+0.05	Following van Dokkum (2007)
Velocity correction	$\pm$ 0.06	See Sect. 4.2.3
Total	-0.06/+0.21

Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text