![]() |
Figure 1: Comparison between spectrophotometry from Clampitt & Burstein (1997) and normalised fluxes at 5560 Å with the fundamental parameters adopted for the abundance analysis of the star HD 73345. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 2:
Comparison between the abundances derived for
HD 73045 (
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 3:
The upper panels show the variation of the standard deviation from the
mean abundance of Fe, Ni, Cr and Ti as a function of
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 4:
As for Fig. 3, but for HD 72757
(
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 5: Comparison between the mean abundances obtained for Am, A- and F-type stars indicated by an open circle, square and triangle respectively. The error bars are the standard deviations from the calculated mean abundances. In the case of only one measurement, no error bar is shown. A- and F-type stars show a similar abundance pattern. The Am stars show the typical peculiar abundance pattern described in detail in Paper I. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 6:
Hertzsprung-Russell diagram of the Praesepe cluster. The crosses
and filled squares show the position on the HR diagram for the Am and normal
A- and F-type stars, respectively. The open squares indicate the
spectroscopic binaries. We did not correct the luminosity of these stars
due to the presence of a companion, but we assume it less than 0.1 dex. The
error bar in luminosity is 0.07 dex. The dashed line shows an isochrone from
Girardi et al. (2002) for the age and metallicity given in the literature
(
![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 7:
Abundances relative to the Sun (Asplund et al. 2005) of C, O, Ca and
Sc as a function of
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 8: Same as in Fig. 7 but for Na, Mg, Si and S. No correlation is found. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 9:
Same as in Fig. 7 but for Ti, Cr, Fe, Ni, Y and Ba. No
correlation is found for Ti. An anticorrelation between Cr, Fe, Ni, Y and Ba abundance and
![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 10:
Abundances relative to the Sun (Asplund et al. 2005) of Mg, Ca and
Fe as a function of the ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 11: Abundances relative to the Sun (Asplund et al. 2005) of C, O, Na, Mg, S and Si as a function of the Fe abundance. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 12: Same as in Fig. 11 but for Ca, Sc, Ti, Cr, Mn, Ni, Y and Ba. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 13:
Comparison between the spectra of HD 73666 obtained with the ESPaDOnS
spectropolarimeter (blue line) and the SOPHIE spectrograph (red line) in the
region of the He I multiplet at ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 14: Same as for Fig. 13, but in the region of the strong Fe II line at 5018.440 Å. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 15: Comparison between the mean abundance of the Am stars analysed in Paper I and the Am star HD 74656. This plot confirms the Am classification of this star. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 16:
Portion of the spectrum of HD 72757 (
![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |