All Figures

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.5cm,clip]{9629fig1.eps}\end{figure}$ Figure 1: Four different observed solar spectra, displayed for four different spectral windows, each containing a Hf II line, indicated by a thin dashed vertical line. For clarity, the intensity spectra, labelled as DI (Delbouille Intensity) and NI (Neckel Intensity), are shifted down by -0.2 units, while the disk-integrated spectra, KF (Kurucz Flux) and NF (Neckel Flux), are shifted up by 0.2 units for the 356.1 nm and 391.8 nm lines. Except for the DI spectrum, the original normalisation has been retained. Note that the different spectra do not always agree perfectly.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.5cm,clip]{9629fig2.eps}\end{figure}$ Figure 2: The Fe I+Ni I blend in the 3D simulation (solid line) is compared to the $\ensuremath {{\rm 1D}_{{\rm LHD}}}$ profile (dash-dotted line), scaled in order to have the same central residual intensity as the 3D profile. The difference of the two spectra is shown as well as a Th 3D line profile.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.5cm,clip]{9629fig3.eps}\end{figure}$ Figure 3: The 3D profile of (Fe I+Ni I) + (Th II+Co I+V II) blend in solid black is over-imposed on the $\ensuremath {{\rm 1D}_{{\rm LHD}}}$ fit (green/grey dashed line). In the plot is also over-imposed (black dashed line) the $\ensuremath {{\rm 1D}_{{\rm LHD}}}$ with the same abundance as the 3D profile as well as the 3D Th II+Co I+V II profile (dotted line).
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=15cm,clip]{9629fig4.eps} \end{figure}$ Figure 4: Fits of the synthetic spectra to the observed solar spectra. On the left hand side, the synthetic spectra have been computed from the $\ensuremath {{\rm CO}^5{\rm BOLD}}$ model, on the right hand side from the corresponding $\ensuremath {{\rm 1D}_{{\rm LHD}}}$ model. On either side, from top to bottom, the spectra are: the Delbouille disc centre intensity, the Neckel disc centre intensity, the Neckel flux and the Kurucz flux. On each panel the sub-components used to synthesise the feature are shown individually: the light dotted line is the Th II+Co I+V II blend, the darker dotted line is the Ni I+Fe I blend, the black dashed lines are, from blue to red, the Mn I+Fe I blend the artificial Fe II line and the Co I 401.93 nm lines.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.5cm,clip]{9629fig2.eps}\end{figure}$	Figure 2: The Fe I+Ni I blend in the 3D simulation (solid line) is compared to the $\ensuremath {{\rm 1D}_{{\rm LHD}}}$ profile (dash-dotted line), scaled in order to have the same central residual intensity as the 3D profile. The difference of the two spectra is shown as well as a Th 3D line profile.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.5cm,clip]{9629fig3.eps}\end{figure}$	Figure 3: The 3D profile of (Fe I+Ni I) + (Th II+Co I+V II) blend in solid black is over-imposed on the $\ensuremath {{\rm 1D}_{{\rm LHD}}}$ fit (green/grey dashed line). In the plot is also over-imposed (black dashed line) the $\ensuremath {{\rm 1D}_{{\rm LHD}}}$ with the same abundance as the 3D profile as well as the 3D Th II+Co I+V II profile (dotted line).
Open with DEXTER