$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=7.8cm,clip]{9260fig1.eps}\end{figure}$ Figure 1: Energy flux versus temperature for heat conductivity 1/5 and 1/100 of the Spitzer value. Note the higher temperature maximum, $1.6\times 10^8$ K, for the lower conductivity value.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=7.8cm,clip]{9260fig2.eps}\end{figure}$ Figure 2: Differential emission measures per surface area [ $\rm {cm^{-5}~K^{-1}}$ ] for heat conductivity 1/5 and 1/100 of the standard Spitzer value.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=7.8cm,clip]{9260fig3.eps}\end{figure}$ Figure 3: Total emission per logarithmic temperature interval for heat conductivity 1/5 and 1/100 of the standard Spitzer value.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=7.8cm,clip]{9260fig4.eps}\end{figure}$ Figure 4: Comparison of total emission per logarithmic temperature interval for a cooling flow model and our model for low conductivity.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.8cm,clip]{9260fig5.eps}\end{figure}$ Figure 5: Comparison of XMM-Newton EPIC spectra for VW Hyi in quiescence with model spectra evaluated for an accretion rate of $\dot M=1.25\times 10^{-12}~M_\odot$ /yr and for different thermal conductivity: a) $1/5 \kappa _{\rm {Sp}}$ , b) $1/25 \kappa _{\rm {Sp}}$ and c) $1/100 \kappa _{\rm {Sp}}$ .
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=7.8cm,clip]{9260fig1.eps}\end{figure}$	Figure 1: Energy flux versus temperature for heat conductivity 1/5 and 1/100 of the Spitzer value. Note the higher temperature maximum, $1.6\times 10^8$ K, for the lower conductivity value.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=7.8cm,clip]{9260fig2.eps}\end{figure}$	Figure 2: Differential emission measures per surface area [ $\rm {cm^{-5}~K^{-1}}$ ] for heat conductivity 1/5 and 1/100 of the standard Spitzer value.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=7.8cm,clip]{9260fig3.eps}\end{figure}$	Figure 3: Total emission per logarithmic temperature interval for heat conductivity 1/5 and 1/100 of the standard Spitzer value.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=7.8cm,clip]{9260fig4.eps}\end{figure}$	Figure 4: Comparison of total emission per logarithmic temperature interval for a cooling flow model and our model for low conductivity.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.8cm,clip]{9260fig5.eps}\end{figure}$	Figure 5: Comparison of XMM-Newton EPIC spectra for VW Hyi in quiescence with model spectra evaluated for an accretion rate of $\dot M=1.25\times 10^{-12}~M_\odot$ /yr and for different thermal conductivity: a) $1/5 \kappa _{\rm {Sp}}$ , b) $1/25 \kappa _{\rm {Sp}}$ and c) $1/100 \kappa _{\rm {Sp}}$ .
Open with DEXTER