Table 3: NIR line fluxes extracted across slit #1 (between -7 $.\!\!^{\prime\prime}$5 and 0 $^{\prime \prime }$) and slit #2 (between -2 $^{\prime \prime }$ and 2 $^{\prime \prime }$).
    Line fluxes (10-18 W m-2) a
$\lambda$ ($\mu $m) Identification Slit #1 Slit #2
2.033 H2 1-0 S(2) 28.3 $\pm$ 3.2 3.2 $\pm$ 1.0
2.042 He 63P-43S 7.7 $\pm$ 1.5 2.3 $\pm$ 0.5
2.058 He 21P-21S 1406 $\pm$ 39 341 $\pm$ 10
2.073 H2 2-1 S(3) 15.0 $\pm$ 2.4 <3
2.112 He 43,1S-33,1P 84.7 $\pm$ 4.0 20.9 $\pm$ 1.2
2.121 H2 1-0 S(1) 147.1 $\pm$ 3.5 20.5 $\pm$ 0.9
2.145 [Fe III] 3G3-3H4 15.2 $\pm$ 1.4 3.5 $\pm$ 0.6
2.154 H2 2-1 S(2) <7 <2
2.161 He 73,1F-43,1D 61.1 $\pm$ 3.3 16.0 $\pm$ 1.1
2.165 Br$\gamma $ 1994 $\pm$ 106 495 $\pm$ 27
2.198 UIR 1 b 13.1 $\pm$ 2.5 2.6 $\pm$ 0.5
2.218 [Fe III] 3G5-3H6 63.4 $\pm$ 1.7 15.7 $\pm$ 0.8
2.223 H2 1-0 S(0) 45.6 $\pm$ 2.2 7.1 $\pm$ 1.0
2.242 [Fe III] 3G4-3H4 25.5 $\pm$ 1.3 7.6 $\pm$ 1.3
2.247 H2 2-1 S(1) 14.3 $\pm$ 1.1 <5
2.286 H2 3-2 S(2) 15.8 $\pm$ 1.8 4.0 $\pm$ 1.0
2.340 H I 31-5 11.4 $\pm$ 3.4 3.9 $\pm$ 1.2
2.344 H I 30-5 16.0 $\pm$ 4.8 <8
2.349 H I 29-5 c 60.7 $\pm$ 18.2 12.5 $\pm$ 3.7
2.354 H I 28-5 16.4 $\pm$ 4.9 3.1 $\pm$ 0.9
2.360 H I 27-5 20.1 $\pm$ 6.0 3.8 $\pm$ 1.1
2.367 H I 26-5 28.0 $\pm$ 8.4 5.1 $\pm$ 1.5
2.374 H I 25-5 19.7 $\pm$ 5.9 5.0 $\pm$ 1.5
2.383 H I 24-5 d 51.4 $\pm$ 15.4 10.4 $\pm$ 3.1
a Errors are at the 1$\sigma$ level and only include the uncertainties coming from the fitting procedure. In the case of the H I Pfund series, we give a larger error of the order of 30% because of the uncertainty fitting the continuum. b The H2 3-2 S(3) transition at 2.201 $\mu $m is observed in regions 1 and 4 of slit #1 (see Table 4). c This line is probably blended with a transition of [Fe III]. d This line is likely contaminated by atmospheric lines.

Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text