All Figures

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=5.5cm,clip]{9034fig1.eps} \end{figure}$ Figure 1: TRACE at 171 Å showing the AR studied here, 2007 May 01. The overplotted box shows the region that was rastered by EIS.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=12cm,clip]{9034fig2.eps} \end{figure}$ Figure 2: Monochromatic images recorded by the EIS. The title of each panel displays the ion name and the respective wavelengths in which these images were created and their peak temperature formation. The arrow in the top middle image indicates a moss region.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=12cm,clip]{9034fig3.eps} \end{figure}$ Figure 3: Left panel: electron density map (cm^-3) derived using the line ratios Fe XII 186 and 195 Å. Middle panel: electron density map overplotted with magnetic field contours. Red contours correspond to positive polarity region whereas blue contours represent negative polarity regions. Right panel: MDI magnetogram of the corresponding region.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.5cm,clip]{9034fig4.eps} \end{figure}$ Figure 4: Plot showing the variation of electron density (cm^-3) and magnetic field strength.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=7.4cm,clip]{9034fig5.eps} \end{figure}$ Figure 5: TRACE at 171 Å passband showing the regions in which the average electron densities were investigated further using different line ratios.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.8cm,clip]{9034fig6.eps} \end{figure}$ Figure 6: Estimated electron densities (cm^-3) at different temperatures for the regions marked in Fig. 5. Error bars are estimated by assuming an error of 10% in the line intensities.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=5.5cm,clip]{9034fig1.eps} \end{figure}$	Figure 1: TRACE at 171 Å showing the AR studied here, 2007 May 01. The overplotted box shows the region that was rastered by EIS.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=12cm,clip]{9034fig2.eps} \end{figure}$	Figure 2: Monochromatic images recorded by the EIS. The title of each panel displays the ion name and the respective wavelengths in which these images were created and their peak temperature formation. The arrow in the top middle image indicates a moss region.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=12cm,clip]{9034fig3.eps} \end{figure}$	Figure 3: Left panel: electron density map (cm^-3) derived using the line ratios Fe XII 186 and 195 Å. Middle panel: electron density map overplotted with magnetic field contours. Red contours correspond to positive polarity region whereas blue contours represent negative polarity regions. Right panel: MDI magnetogram of the corresponding region.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.5cm,clip]{9034fig4.eps} \end{figure}$	Figure 4: Plot showing the variation of electron density (cm^-3) and magnetic field strength.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=7.4cm,clip]{9034fig5.eps} \end{figure}$	Figure 5: TRACE at 171 Å passband showing the regions in which the average electron densities were investigated further using different line ratios.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.8cm,clip]{9034fig6.eps} \end{figure}$	Figure 6: Estimated electron densities (cm^-3) at different temperatures for the regions marked in Fig. 5. Error bars are estimated by assuming an error of 10% in the line intensities.
Open with DEXTER