Table 2: Comparison between the estimated parameters of different parametrised mass profiles from the literature.
Reference $\sigma $ $r_{\rm {c}}$ Method
  km s-1 kpc  
Cohen & Kneib (2002) 910 $\pm $ 130   kinematic
Allen et al. (2002) 1590 $\pm $ 150 38 $\pm $ 8 X-ray
Kling et al. (2005) 1400 $^{\rm +130}_{-140}$   WL
Fischer & Tyson (1997) 1500 $\pm $ 160   WL
This work 1949 $\pm $ 40 117 $\pm $ 12 SL
Reference c r200 Method
    Mpc  
Allen et al. (2002) 5.87 $\pm $ 1.4 1.99 $^{\rm +1.19}_{-0.60}$ X-ray
Gitti et al. (2007) 3.2 $\pm $ 0.3 2.31 $\pm $ 0.36 X-ray
Kling et al. (2005) 15 $^{\rm +64}_{-10}$ 2.64 $^{\rm +0.14}_{-0.57}$ WL
This work 5.4 $_{\rm -0.5}^{+0.7}$ 3.29 $\pm $ 0.20 SL

Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text