![]() |
Figure 1: [O/Fe] abundance ratio versus oxygen abundance [O/H]. The dashed and dotted lines are drawn for convenience. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 2: Sulfur to iron abundance ratio, [S/Fe], versus sulfur abundance relative to solar, [S/H]. The lines are drawn for convenience. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 3: Oxygen abundance relative to solar, [O/H], versus silicon abundance [Si/H]. Dotted line is for [O/H] = [Si/H]. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 4: [N/O] abundance ratio versus neutral hydrogen column density log N(H I). The vertical dotted line indicates the standard definition of DLA systems (log N(H I) > 20.3). |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 5: Histogram of [N/O] abundance ratios for the 13 systems with definite measurements in our sample. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 6:
Nitrogen to oxygen abundance ratio, [N/O],
versus nitrogen abundance [N/H]. [X/H] = (X/H) - (X/H)![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 7:
Upper panel: nitrogen to oxygen abundance ratio, [N/O],
versus oxygen abundance [O/H]. [X/H] = (X/H)-(X/H)![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 8: N I and O I absorption lines in the DLA systems: Q 0102-190, z = 2.926; Q 0112-306, z = 2.418; Q 0841+129, z = 2.476 and Q 0913+072, z = 2.618 from top to bottom, respectively. Model fits are overplotted. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 9: N I and O I absorption lines in the DLA systems: Q 1108-077, z = 3.608; Q 1337+113, z = 2.508; Q 1337+113, z = 2.796 and Q 1340-136, z = 3.118 from top to bottom, respectively. Model fits are overplotted. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 10: N I and O I absorption lines in the DLA systems: Q 1409+095, z = 2.456; Q 1409+095, z = 2.668; Q 2059-360, z = 3.083 and Q 2332-094, z = 3.057 from top to bottom, respectively. Model fits are overplotted. |
Open with DEXTER |