![]() |
Figure 1:
Time evolution of the different contributions to the gas
binding energy in the bulge of a Milky Way like galaxy: dark matter
halo (dashed line), bulge (dotted line), and exponential disk (solid
line). In particular,
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 2: Time evolution of the Eddington (dashed line) and Bondi (dot-dashed line) accretion rates for bulges with various masses. The thicker lines indicate the resulting accretion rate, which is assumed to be the minimum between the two. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 3: Energy balance as a function of time for bulges with various masses. The figure shows the gas binding energy (solid line) compared to the thermal energy released by supernovae (dashed line) and the accreting black hole (dot-dashed line). |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 4:
Star formation rate as a function of time and
redshift for bulges with various masses. The peak value of the
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 5: Final black-hole masses as a function of the bulge mass predicted by our models (triangles). The short dashed-long dashed line represents the measured relation of McLure & Dunlop (2002), the dotted line the one of Marconi & Hunt (2003), and the dashed line the one of Häring & Rix (2004). |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 6: Evolution with time and redshift of the bolometric luminosity emitted by the accreting BH for bulges of various masses. The dotted lines represent the range spanned by observations (see text for details). |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 7:
Evolution with time (bottom axis) and redshift (top axis) of
the metallicity in solar units
![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 8: Evolution with time (bottom axis) and redshift (top axis) of the [Fe/H] abundance ratio in bulges of various masses, as indicated in the lower right corner. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 9:
Evolution with time and redshift of the [X/H] abundance
ratios for ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 10:
Correlation with bulge mass of the [X/Fe] abundance ratios
for
![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 11:
Correlation with bulge mass of the [N/C] abundance ratio
for
![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 12:
Evolution with time and redshift of the [X/H] abundance
ratios for Fe, Mg, and N in bulges of various masses and the adoption
of a Salpeter (1955) IMF above
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 13:
Evolution of the predicted (U-B) ( upper panel) and (B-K) ( lower panel) colours for bulge models of three different masses
(dotted line:
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 14:
Evolution of the predicted (U-B) ( upper panel) and (B-K) ( lower panel) colours for a bulge model of mass
![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 15: Predicted and observed colour-magnitude relation for bulges. The solid line and the dotted lines are the regression and the dispersion of CMR observed by Itoh & Ichikawa (1998), respectively. The solid circles and open squares are our predictions for the three bulge models studied in this paper, computed by assuming for the IMF x2=0.95 and x2=1.35, respectively. Panel b) R vs. (U-R) diagram. The open circles are the data by Peletier & Balcells (1996). Solid circles and open squares as in panel a). Panel c) R vs. (R-K) diagram. Open circles, solid circles, and open squares as in panel a). |
Open with DEXTER |