**Table 4:** Chemical abundances of the secondary star in Nova Scorpii 1994.
Element	$[{\rm X}/{\rm H}]_{\rm LTE}^{a,b}$	$\sigma$	$\Delta_\sigma^{c}$	$\Delta_{T_{\rm eff}}$	$\Delta_{\log g}$	$\Delta_{\rm tot}$	$n_{\rm lines}^{d}$
O^e	0.91	0.07	0.04	0	0.07	0.09	3
Na	0.31	0.37	0.18	0.19	0	0.26	4
Mg	0.48	0.29	0.09	0.10	-0.03	0.15	10
Al	0.05	0.15	0.15	0.1	0	0.18	1
Si	0.58	0.21	0.06	0.05	0.01	0.08	12
S	0.66	0.18	0.09	-0.04	0.06	0.12	4
Ca	-0.02	0.17	0.07	0.12	0.01	0.14	7
Ti	0.27	0.11	0.07	0.2	0.05	0.22	2
Fe	-0.11	0.11	0.03	0.09	0.01	0.10	9
Ni	0	0.10	0.06	0.2	0.05	0.21	5
Li^f	2.13	0.15	0.15	0.15	0	0.21	1

^a The solar element abundances were adopted from Grevesse et al. (1996) and Ecuvillon et al. (2006): $\log \epsilon({\rm O })_{\odot}=8.74$ , $\log \epsilon({\rm Na})_{\odot}=6.33$ , $\log \epsilon({\rm Mg})_{\odot}=7.58$ , $\log \epsilon({\rm Al})_{\odot}=6.47$ , $\log \epsilon({\rm Si})_{\odot}=7.55$ , $\log \epsilon({\rm S })_{\odot}=7.21$ , $\log \epsilon({\rm Ca})_{\odot}=6.36$ , $\log \epsilon({\rm Ti})_{\odot}=4.99$ , $\log \epsilon({\rm Fe})_{\odot}=7.50$ , $\log \epsilon({\rm Ni})_{\odot}=6.25$ .
^b Element abundances (calculated assuming LTE) are ${\rm [X/H]}= \log [N({\rm X})/N({\rm H})]_{\rm star} - \log [N({\rm X})/N({\rm H})]_{\rm Sun}$ , where $N({\rm X})$ is the number density of atoms. Uncertainties, $\Delta_{\rm tot}$ , are at 1 $\sigma$ level and take into account the error in the stellar parameters and the dispersion of the measurements.
^c The errors from the dispersion of the best fits to different features, see text.
^d Number of features analysed for each element.
^e LTE abundance of oxygen, see text.
^f Li abundance is expressed as:

$\begin{displaymath}\log \epsilon({\rm Li})_{\rm NLTE} = \log [N({\rm Li})/N({\rm H})]_{\rm NLTE} + 12.\end{displaymath}$