\begin{table}%t1
\caption{Model parameters corresponding to Figs.~\ref{sedmono} and~\ref{sedpowerlawall}.}\label{tabvalues}
\small%\centerline
 {
\begin{tabular}{lllll}
\hline\hline  
& {Mono (dashed)} & {Mono (solid)} & {Power-law (dashed)} & {Power-law (solid)}
 \\
 \hline 
Primary parameters  & & & & \\
$z$   & 0.3 & 0.3 & 0.3 & 0.3 \\
$\Delta t$ (days)   & 4.1 & 4.1 & 4.1 & 4.1\\
$\mathcal{D}$   & 55 & 55 & 30 & 65\\
$\nup$ (Hz)  & $5.5\times10^{13}$ & $3.9\times10^{11}$ & $2.0\times10^{11}$ & $2.7\times10^{11}$ \\
$\nucool$ (Hz) & $1.74\times10^{12}$ & $1.17\times10^{19}$ & $2.07\times10^{16}$ & $2.14\times10^{19}$  \\
$\numax$ (Hz) & $\dots$ & $\dots$ & $1.0\times10^{18}$ & $1.5\times10^{15}$   \\
$\xi$ & $10^{-2.5}$ & $10^{-0.75}$ & $\dots$ & $\dots$   \\
\hline   
  Secondary parameters  \\
$\xi$ & $\dots$ & $\dots$ & $0.92$ & $0.86$  \\
 $R$ (pc) & 0.15 & 0.15 & 0.08 & 0.17 \\
 $\theta_{\rm d}$ ($\mu$as) & 32.5 & 32.5 & 17.7 & 38.4   \\
 $\gammap$ & 691 & 800 & 244 & 696   \\
 $\gcool$ & 123 & $4.39\times10^6$ & $7.85\times10^4$ & $6.19\times10^6$   \\
 $\gammamax$ & $\dots$ & $\dots$ & $5.45\times10^5$ & $5.19\times10^4$   \\
 $\nelec$ (cm$^{-3}$)& 0.02 & 0.70 & 3.15 & 0.32 \\
 $B$ (mG) & 648 & 3.43 & 34.7 & 2.65   \\
 $\delta$ & $\dots$ & $\dots$ & 0.97 & 0.93    \\
 $U_{\rm B}/U_{\rm par}$ & $1.8\times10^{3}$ & $1.0\times10^{-3}$ & 0.04 & $8.4\times10^{-4}$  \\
 $T_{\rm B}$ (K) & $3.7\times10^{12}$ & $3.9\times10^{12}$ & $1.4\times10^{13}$ & $2.5\times10^{12}$   \\
 $\tauT$ & $6\times10^{-9}$ & $2\times10^{-7}$ & $5\times10^{-7}$ & $1\times10^{-7}$   \\
 $P_{\rm jet}$ (ergs/s) & $1\times10^{45}$ & $3\times10^{43}$ & $5\times10^{42}$ & $4\times10^{43}$  \\
 \hline 
\end{tabular}}
Note: $\theta_{\rm d}$ is the angular diameter of the source, $U_{\rm par}$ the energy density of the particles, and $P_{\rm jet}$ is the jet power in the rest frame of the host galaxy, as predicted by each model. The compactness of all four models are negligibly small so not included in the discussion.
\end{table}