![]() |
Figure 1:
Top: variation of CO and H2 column densities
observed in uv (rectangles; Sonnentrucker et al. 2007; and
Burgh et al. 2007) and mm-wave (triangles; Liszt & Lucas 1998) CO absorption. Lines of sight represented in Fig. 5 are outlined and shown in green.
For the mm-wave data N(H2) = N(HCO+)/2 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 2:
Variation of X(12CO) = N(12CO)/N(H2) with N(H2).
The regression line shown has slope 1.014 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 3: Left: variation of N(12CO)/N(13CO) with N(H2) ( left) and N(12CO). Where possible points are labeled with estimates of K from H2 ( at left) and C2 ( right) as tabulated by Burgh et al. (2007) and Sheffer et al. (2007) for H2 and Sonnentrucker et al. (2007) for H2 and C2. Radiofrequency data are those of Liszt & Lucas (1998). There is no tendency for the column density ratio to vary monotonically with the H2 temperature and only a very loose trend with that of C2. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 4:
Variation of N(12CO)/N(13CO) with X(CO) = N(12CO)/N(H2)
compared with the model chemistry (curves) described in Sect. 4.5 of the
text. Models are for I=3, K = 45 K, n(H2) = 50
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 5:
Variation of 12CO J=1-0 rotational excitation temperature
plotted against N(H2) ( left) and N(12CO). Radio data are shown
as lower limits because they involve the assumption of a beam efficiency.
Data from the work of Burgh et al. (2007) and Sonnentrucker et al. (2007)
are shown separately; sightlines with measurements in both references are
shown chained, note that the former typically derives slightly stronger
excitation in these cases. Data labelled "radio'' are those of
Liszt & Lucas (1998). Superposed on the data are calculated results for
uniform-density spherical models having total densites n(H) = 64 and
128
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 6:
Integrated 12CO J=1-0
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |