All Figures

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[clip,width=8.8cm]{7450fig1.eps}\end{figure}$ Figure 1: Sky distribution for 196 defining sources ( top) and all 525 sources ( bottom) common for the input catalogues.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[clip,width=8.5cm]{7450fig2.eps}\end{figure}$ Figure 2: WRMS differences between the input catalogues and ICRF. Unit: $\mu$ as.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[clip,width=8.8cm]{7450fig3.eps}\end{figure}$ Figure 3: An example of the quality of analytical representation of the differences between the input catalogues and the ICRF with different methods using the USNO catalogue. From top to bottom: original differences (gridded surface) and the result of approximation using the rotation model, the same for rotation with deformation, the same for Legendre-Fourier functions. Horizontal axes show right ascension ( right) and declination ( left) in degrees. Unit: $\mu$ as.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[clip,width=8.5cm]{7450fig4.eps}\end{figure}$ Figure 4: WRMS differences between the input catalogues transformed to the ICRF system and the combined catalogue RSC(PUL)07C01. Unit: $\mu$ as.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[clip,width=8.8cm]{7450fig5.eps}\end{figure}$ Figure 5: Differences between RSC(PUL)07C01 and the ICRF. Horizontal axes show right ascension ( right) and declination ( left) in degrees. Unit: $\mu$ as.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[clip,width=8.8cm]{7450fig6.eps}\end{figure}$ Figure 6: Differences between RSC(PUL)07C02 and the ICRF. Horizontal axes show right ascension ( right) and declination ( left) in degrees. Unit: $\mu$ as.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[clip,width=8.8cm]{7450fig1.eps}\end{figure}$	Figure 1: Sky distribution for 196 defining sources ( top) and all 525 sources ( bottom) common for the input catalogues.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[clip,width=8.5cm]{7450fig2.eps}\end{figure}$	Figure 2: WRMS differences between the input catalogues and ICRF. Unit: $\mu$ as.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[clip,width=8.5cm]{7450fig4.eps}\end{figure}$	Figure 4: WRMS differences between the input catalogues transformed to the ICRF system and the combined catalogue RSC(PUL)07C01. Unit: $\mu$ as.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[clip,width=8.8cm]{7450fig5.eps}\end{figure}$	Figure 5: Differences between RSC(PUL)07C01 and the ICRF. Horizontal axes show right ascension ( right) and declination ( left) in degrees. Unit: $\mu$ as.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[clip,width=8.8cm]{7450fig6.eps}\end{figure}$	Figure 6: Differences between RSC(PUL)07C02 and the ICRF. Horizontal axes show right ascension ( right) and declination ( left) in degrees. Unit: $\mu$ as.
Open with DEXTER