A&A 473, 829-845 (2007)
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20078007
Red giants in open clusters
XIII. Orbital elements of 156 spectroscopic binaries
,
J.-C. Mermilliod1 - J. Andersen2,3 - D. W. Latham4 - M. Mayor5
1 - Laboratoire d'Astrophysique de l'École polytechnique fédérale de
Lausanne, 1290 Sauverny, Switzerland
2 -
The Niels Bohr Institute, Astronomy Group, Juliane Maries Vej 30, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
3 -
Nordic Optical Telescope Scientific Association, Apartado 474,
38700 Santa Cruz de La Palma, Canarias, Spain
4 - Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge,
Massachusetts 02138, USA
5 -
Observatoire de Genève, 51 Ch. des Maillettes, 1290 Sauverny, Switzerland
Received 4 June 2007 / Accepted 9 July 2007
Abstract
Context. The identification and characterisation of spectroscopic binaries with red-giant primaries in open clusters is important for a proper understanding of the colour-magnitude diagrams of the clusters. Moreover, the orbital eccentricities and axial rotations of these binaries are valuable probes into the inner structure and tidal interaction of the stars.
Aims. We report on a comprehensive, long-term monitoring programme aiming to improve our knowledge of such binary systems.
Methods. The radial velocities of 1309 red giants in 187 open clusters in the whole sky have been monitored with the CORAVEL and CfA spectrometers for 20 years, with a typical accuracy of 0.4 km s-1 per observation.
Results. In total, 289 spectroscopic binaries were detected in the sample. We present first orbits for 67 systems and improved elements for another 64 previously published orbits, based on additional observations. For completeness, 25 published orbits are listed as well. The orbits are based on a total of 4039 observations, an average of 26 per system. Orbital periods range from 41.5 to 14 722 days (40 yrs), eccentricities from 0.00 to 0.81. The remaining 133 systems have too long periods, too few observations, and/or inadequate phase coverage for an orbit determination at this time.
Conclusions. This paper provides a dramatic increase in the body of homogeneous orbital data available for red-giant spectroscopic binaries in open clusters. It will form the basis for a comprehensive discussion of membership, kinematics, and stellar and tidal evolution in the parent clusters.
Key words: Galaxy: open clusters and associations: general - stars: binaries: spectroscopic - techniques: radial velocities - stars: late-type
Open star clusters are important tracers of Galactic structure, kinematics, and evolution (e.g. Friel 1995).
They are also important test objects for studies of stellar evolution, the initial mass function (IMF), and the dynamical
evolution of stellar systems (e.g. Nordström et al. 1997). Open clusters therefore have a long history
of observational studies, but the amount of data available depends heavily on the observational technique, and spectroscopic
data such as radial and rotational velocities are still lacking for many cluster stars.
As the brightest cluster stars and having strong-lined late-type spectra, the giant members offer the best opportunities for
determining the systemic velocity of a cluster. In themselves, they are also important tracers of the precise shape of stellar
evolution tracks in the HR diagram, in a domain where significant uncertainties remain in theoretical models and in their
translation into observable parameters.
Identifying and characterising the binary systems among the cluster giants is important for several reasons. First, only their mean
or systemic velocities are reliable guides to the velocity of the cluster itself and/or the membership of the star.
Second, the presence of a companion may change the position of the star in the colour-magnitude diagram in ways that may
confuse its interpretation: e.g., the combined colours of a red-giant primary with a bluer main-sequence companion may
place the system within the Hertzsprung gap, mimicking a blue loop in the evolutionary track. Finally, the time scales for
tidal circularisation of the orbit and synchronisation of the rotation of binary red giants in open clusters are particularly
informative, because the masses, radii, and ages of the stars are known from stellar evolution theory (Mermilliod & Mayor 1996).
Furthermore, observations of the red giants provide information on long-period, low-amplitudes binaries that are
not easily detected among A-type main-sequence stars because of the small number of lines and more rapid rotation.
Accordingly, the red giants may provide important information on the binary frequency among the more massive cluster members.
A survey of the literature shows that the characteristics of spectroscopic binaries with red-giant
primaries and members of open clusters are still poorly known. When our observing programme was initiated in 1977, only two
orbits were known, one for Tr 91 in the Coma Bererenices cluster (VinterHansen 1940) and one for vB 41 in the Hyades (Griffin & Gunn 1977).
Since then, orbital elements for some eleven binaries in northern open clusters have been published in addition to those from
the CORAVEL programme. Mathieu et al. (1986) published orbital elements for the 7 red-giant spectroscopic binaries
in M67, the best-observed cluster. Lee et al. (1989)
published an orbit for the two binaries discovered in NGC 6705 (M11). McClure & Woodsworth (1990)
determined an orbit for the Barium red giant #250 in NGC 2420. Torres et al. (1997) published orbital
elements for the long-period binary vB 71 in the Hyades, and Gim et al. (1998) obtained radial velocities for
115 red giants in the field of NGC 7789. They discovered 21 spectroscopic binaries, but no orbits were determined.
In 1977 we therefore initiated a long-term observing programme to determine accurate radial velocities of red giants
in a large number of open clusters, using the CORAVEL instruments (Baranne et al. 1979) from
Haute-Provence Observatory (OHP), France, in the north and extended it in 1983 to the southern hemisphere, in the ESO
Observatory at La Silla, Chile. A special aim of this programme was to follow suspected or confirmed binaries over the lifetime
of these instruments in order to determine their orbital elements as far as possible, and some systems were followed even later at the CfA.
This paper presents the results of this programme and provides first orbital elements for 67 new spectroscopic binaries and
improved elements for another 64 systems published earlier (cf. Mermilliod et al. 1989). To our knowledge, except
for the CORAVEL results, no orbit has been published for any of the objects discussed here. We thus provide a
dramatic increase in the number of known orbits for red-giant binaries in galactic open clusters. Moreover, the homogeneity of the data and the
observing strategy will allow reliable assessment of the statistical properties of the sample, which will follow in a forthcoming paper.
In defining the sample, we tried to include all stars in each cluster, which presented reasonable chances of being red-giant members, as judged
from their positions in the colour-magnitude diagrams and other available data. Stars located
within the Hertzsprung gap were prime candidates for being binaries, and in many cases were confirmed by subsequent observations. A few additional
red stars in the fields of some clusters were noticed at the telescope and added to the observing program. Consequently, the sample observed
should contain a high fraction of the potential red-giant cluster members.
In a systematic programme with the two CORAVEL photoelectric
radial-velocity scanners (Baranne et al. 1979; Mayor 1985), we have observed 1309 red giants in the field of 187 open clusters over the whole sky.
For the northern observations we used the CORAVEL mounted on the 1-m Swiss telescope at OHP during the 19 years from January 1978 to October 1997.
The southern CORAVEL was installed on the Danish 1.54-m telescope at La Silla during the 15 years from March 1981 to July 1996.
The CORAVEL programme ended when both instruments were decommissioned in 1997.
The radial velocities listed here are on the system defined by Udry et al. (1999), calibrated with high-precision data from the ELODIE
spectrograph (Baranne et al. 1996). This calibration implies a
zero-point change of the order of 0.3-0.4 km s-1 with respect to
data published before 2001 and modifies the systemic velocities of binary orbits published earlier by a similar amount. Integration
times were typically 180-300 s, but could exceed 600 s if needed to obtain a minimum of
1000-1200 counts per channel in the cross-correlation profile. Typical
errors of a single measurement are then 0.3-0.7 km s-1, the majority being close to 0.4 km s-1.
After 1997, additional radial velocities were obtained by DWL with the
CfA Digital Speedometers (Latham 1992) in order to complete the
orbits for a number of binaries. The error of a single observation is
0.5 km s-1. The CfA radial velocities are on an
absolute system defined by extensive observations of minor planets, as
described by Stefanik et al. (1999), except that
0.139 km s-1 have been added to the velocities on the native CfA
system, rather than subtracted as specified by mistake by Stefanik et al. (1999).
The 335 CfA observations are available in electronic form
only. Table 1 contains the cluster and star designations, the
Julian dates, the radial velocities and errors in km s-1. Only
five records are displayed in Table 1 to illustrate the
format.
Table 1:
CfA observations.
Radial velocities for a number of stars in IC 4756 were measured with a
CORAVEL-type spectrometer attached to the 1.65-m telescope at Moletai Observatory, Lithuania, in 2003 and
kindly communicated by Dr. J. Sperauskas (2005). The instrument is described by Upgren et al. (2002). These observations
are listed in Table 2. Comparison of the mean radial velocities for constant stars showed that these radial velocities are on the same system as CORAVEL.
Table 2:
Sperauskas observations in IC 4756.
The publication of the complete set of radial velocities obtained with
CORAVEL in both hemispheres is in preparation (Mermilliod & Mayor 2007a). The detailed data (Julian dates, radial velocities and errors) for all binaries discussed in this paper will become available there.
Meanwhile, specific data may be obtained from the first author (JCM).
The orbital elements contained in Tables 3 to 8 are merged in a single
electronic file available in the ftp archive at the CDS. The records
are ordered by cluster name and star number, one line per star.
J2000 coordinates are given for each system.
The orbital solutions were computed with a Fortran code developed by
Imbert at Marseille observatory and adapted to the CORAVEL
database at Geneva observatory by Lucke.
Among the 896 southern giants observed, we found a total of 192 spectroscopic
binaries; as many as possible were monitored to determine the orbital elements.
Tables 3-5 present our orbital elements for 86 binaries in 37 southern open clusters. No orbits could be determined for
the remaining 106 systems, either because the periods were too long or
because the shape of the orbits prevented us from getting satisfactory phase
coverage during the available observing runs.
Essentially all the systems are single-lined binaries, although several must
have mass ratios close to unity. This is easily understood, because the
companions are mainly A-type upper main-sequence stars rotating too fast
(
50 km s-1) to be observable with the CORAVELs.
IC 4651-8665, L244 in Mermilliod et al. (1995), is the only double-lined
system discovered.
When the secondary is an upper main-sequence star, the combined photometry of
the system can be decomposed to yield the magnitudes and colours of both
components as described by Mermilliod & Mayor (1992, Fig. 6). Once the
mass of the red giant has been estimated from an isochrone, the minimum mass of
the secondary follows from f(m). We will make systematic use of this possibility in discussing such stars.
Our new orbital elements for 36 new spectroscopic binaries are presented in
Table 3, and the corresponding radial-velocity curves are shown in
Figs. 1 and 2. Most of the new orbits pertain to open clusters which have not been discussed previously, mainly because they contain few red giants. As
judged by their systemic velocities, several of these red-giant binaries are in
fact non-members, as discussed below for each cluster.
Most of the new orbits have enough observations to characterise the
radial-velocity curves completely. We have also completed the orbits for some stars that were
flagged as binaries in previous papers, but for which no orbital elements could
be determined at the time. For some of the longest-period systems only one
entire cycle could be covered, and a few tentative orbits are
based on only
12 points. If several solutions were found by the code, we
retained the solution which was the most stable after performing several iterations.
Table 3:
New orbital elements for 36 binaries observed at La Silla.
Orbital elements for another 35 binaries were published in earlier papers
on CORAVEL data for red giants in open clusters:
IC 2488 (Clariá et al. 2003), IC 4651 (Mermilliod et al. 1995; Meibom et al. 2002), Melotte 71 (Mermilliod et al. 1997b), NGC 2360 (Mermilliod & Mayor 1990), NGC 2437, NGC 2489, NGC 2567, NGC 3033, NGC 6134 and NGC 6664 (Mermilliod et al. 1997a),
NGC 3680 (Mermilliod et al. 1995; Nordström et al.
1997), and NGC 5822 (Mermilliod et al. 1989;
Mermilliod et al. 1997a).
For many of these systems, additional observations were obtained since
those papers. In addition, the zero point of the radial velocities was
corrected (by 0.3-0.4 km s-1; see above) to bring them onto the
CORAVEL radial-velocity system of Udry et al. (1999).
When no new measurements were obtained since the first publication, we
recomputed the orbits with the corrected radial velocities. We do not show the
radial-velocity curves again, because the changes are generally not visible on
small-scale plots.
Revised orbital elements for these systems are listed in Table 4,
in the same format as Table 3. The changes are not large, but the
errors are much reduced.
Table 4:
Improved orbital elements for 35 binaries observed at La Silla
(same format as Table 3).
Orbital elements for 3 binaries in NGC 1817 and 13 in NGC 2477
have been published earlier (Mermilliod et al. 2003; Eigenbrod et al. 2004). For completeness, these orbits are summarised in
Table 5 (format as for Table 3). The orbit for NGC 1817-56
has been revised and appears in fact in Table 4.
Table 5:
Published orbital elements for 15 binaries observed at La Silla
(same format as Table 3).
Table 6:
New orbital elements for 31 binaries observed from OHP
(same format as Table 3).
Table 7:
Improved orbital elements for 29 binaries observed from OHP
(same format as Table 3).
Table 8:
Published or revised orbital elements for 10 binaries observed from OHP (same format as Table 3).
Many clusters in our observing program were not yet discussed, because
earlier papers focused on objects with larger numbers of red giants (N > 10).
These clusters are briefly discussed below, with references to the star
numberings used. These references should be identical to those in the
open-cluster data base WEBDA (http://www.univie.ac.at/webda/).
Observations of 13 red giants in the field of IC 2488 were
analysed by Clariá et al. (2003). An orbit was obtained for star #67, which is however a non-member.
Radial-velocity observations of 20 red giants in the field of IC 4651
were analysed by Mermilliod et al. (1995). New observations allow us to
improve the orbital elements for #6686 (L97), 14290 (L236), and 14641 (L139),
while the orbits of #8665 (L244) and 10195 (L241) were updated. Star #8665
is a double-lined binary (Mermilliod et al. 1995) with a mass ratio of M2/M1 = 1.10.
The red giant thus seems to be slightly less massive than the main sequence component.
The respective amplitudes are 20.08
1.55 km s-1 for the red giant and
18.21
1.50 km s-1 for the main sequence component. The latter may be a close binary
itself, which would explain its larger mass. Numbers are from Meibom (2000), L numbers from
Lindoff (1972). See also the comprehensive study of the cluster by Meibom et al. (2002).
Radial velocities of 24 red giants in Melotte 71 were discussed in
Mermilliod et al. (1997b). Eight binaries were discovered and four orbits
determined. The orbital elements have been updated to the new zero point.
The radial velocities of #17, 83, 120, 182 in Melotte 105 (Piatti et al. 2001) form two possible pairs for membership. Examination of the
colour-magnitude diagram supports the membership of stars #17 and 182. Star #17 is a spectroscopic binary, but shows no effect of a companion in the CMD.
Star #270, not observed, is a possible member according to its position close
to star #17.
The orbital elements of two of the three red-giant binaries determined by Mermilliod et al.
(2003) are repeated for completeness in Table 5; they were
already on the new zero-point system. Five new observations of star #56 (Cuffey 1938) obtained at CfA showed that the true period is twice that given in the earlier paper; the new elements are
included in Table 4. Six observations also obtained at CfA
permitted to compute a first orbit for star #244. The period is the second shortest in our sample,
P = 43
2488, and the orbit is circular (e = 0.021
0.035).
Seventeen stars were observed in the field of NGC 2324. The
membership of 9 red giants was confirmed, and three spectroscopic binaries were
discovered (Mermilliod et al. 2001). A preliminary orbit, based on 12 points, was determined for star #1006 (Piatti et al. 2004). The
systemic velocity confirms its membership in the cluster.
![\begin{figure}
\par\includegraphics[width=15.35cm,clip]{8007fig1.eps} \end{figure}](/articles/aa/full/2007/39/aa8007-07/Timg17.gif) |
Figure 1:
Radial-velocity curves for 20 of the 36 new southern orbits in Table 3. |
| Open with DEXTER |
![\begin{figure}
\par\includegraphics[width=15.35cm,clip]{8007fig2.eps} \end{figure}](/articles/aa/full/2007/39/aa8007-07/Timg18.gif) |
Figure 2:
Radial-velocity curve for the remaining 16 southern binaries from Table 3. |
| Open with DEXTER |
Five spectroscopic binaries were identified in NGC 2360 (Mermilliod et al. 1999). Orbital elements for #51 and 181 (Becker et al. 1976) were published earlier
(Mermilliod et al. 1989). Three new orbits were determined. Additional observations permitted to compute a circular
orbit with a period of 4861
96 days for #52, rather unusual for such a long period.
An observation made on Feb. 20, 2007 (JD = 2 454 152.667,
= +26.55
0.01 km s-1) by M. Marmier with
the CORALIE spectrograph at the 1.2 m Euler telescope at La Silla permitted to cover
one entire cycle for star #44 and compute the fourth orbit in this cluster, with a period as long as 8398
.
Finally, adding a radial velocity by Hamdani et al. (2000) to our CORAVEL data
permitted to find a stable solution for #62, although the phase coverage is incomplete and the orbital elements preliminary.
We thus now have orbital solutions for all five binaries in this cluster.
The photometric deconvolution of star #181 gives M2
2.15
,
while the mass function (f(m) = 0.474) combined with M1 = 2.36
gives a minimum mass for M2 of 2.12
.
Three spectroscopic binaries were found in NGC 2423 (Mermilliod &
Mayor 1990). A preliminary orbit was determined for #43, but the
eccentricity is high, the amplitude small, and not all critical phases are well
covered.
All four stars observed, #29, 150, 174, 242 (Cuffey 1941), are members
of NGC 2437, and three are spectroscopic binaries. We provide new
orbital elements for #29 and improved elements for #242. The rather large
value of f(m) = 0.322 for #242 gives a minimum mass of 2.08
(for
= 1), while the photometric separation gives M2 = 2.17
.
The period of #174 is probably long and the orbit eccentric. The radial
velocity of star #150 is so far constant, although the star is well inside the
Hertzsprung gap. The photometric separation yields a mass of 2.72
for the presumed upper main-sequence secondary.
NGC 2447 was discussed by Mermilliod & Mayor (1989). They found
3 definite and one suspected spectroscopic binaries among the 13 members and
determined an orbit for star #25 (Becker et al. 1976). The new
observations enable us to compute orbital elements for #42 as well. Although
not all phases have been observed, the number of cycles covered makes the period
determination quite secure. The radial velocity of #38 seems to be constant,
although this star is located in the middle of the Hertzsprung gap. The mean
velocity supports its membership. The separation must be large, since no motion
has been detected during 13 years and the dispersion around the mean
velocity corresponds to the average internal error.
Eigenbrod et al. (2004) discussed NGC 2477 in detail.
They found 26 definite spectroscopic binaries and determined orbital elements
for 13 systems, which are reproduced in Table 5 for completeness.
Here, we provide preliminary orbital elements for another 3 binaries, #1272,
3170 and 4067 (Hartwick & Hesser 1974).
Five stars were observed in NGC 2482. Among the three members, #7 and
23 are binaries (Moffat & Vogt 1975), while #9 is constant.
Of the seven red giants measured in NGC 2489, #14, 25, 36, 37, 50 and
103 are members (Lindoff & Johansson 1968). The orbit of star #25 by
Mermilliod et al. (1997a) has been improved.
#17, 109 and 125 (Lindoff 1968) are confirmed
members, and #17 is a long-period binary.
Of the nine stars observed in the field of NGC 2567, the radial
velocities confirm the membership of #16, 37, 54, 104, 114 (Lindoff
1968). #104 is the only binary among them; the orbital elements by
Mermilliod et al. (1997a) were improved.
Star #5 (Lyngå 1959) is the only red giant in the field of
NGC 2670. Its position in the colour-magnitude diagram is compatible
with membership, but its membership cannot be checked because no radial
velocities of main-sequence stars are available. Its circular orbit conforms to
the relation between cutoff period for orbital circularization and the red-giant mass
(Mermilliod & Mayor 1996).
All three stars observed in NGC 2925, #92, 95 and 108
(Topaktas 1981), are cluster members. #92 is a binary.
Four stars were observed in the field of NGC 2972. #2 is a non-member,
and #3, 11 and 14 are members (Vogt & Moffat 1973). #14, a bright
giant, is a binary with a circular orbit of period compatible with the mass of
the stars (cf. comment under NGC 2670).
Both red giants in the field of NGC 3033, #12 and 19 (Vogt &
Moffat 1973) are spectroscopic binaries with known orbits (Mermilliod et al. 1997a). Only #19 seems to be a member, but radial velocities for
main-sequence stars are required for confirmation.
Eleven stars were observed in NGC 3532. Three (#273, 522 (SB1O), and
649, Fernandez & Salgado 1980) are non-members, and 8 are members (#19,
100, 122, 152, 160, 221, 596, and 670). #152 and 160 are spectroscopic
binaries, and their orbits have been determined.
Radial-velocity observations of 15 red giants in the field of NGC 3680
were analysed by Mermilliod et al. (1995); the orbital elements have been
updated here. A comprehensive study of stellar and dynamical evolution in
NGC 3680 was published by Nordström et al. (1997).
Observations of 14 red giants in NGC 3960 have been published by
Mermilliod et al. (2001). Five binaries were discovered and three orbits
determined. The orbital elements have been updated.
Five red-giant candidates noticed on the ESO survey and 8 stars selected from
the photometry of NGC 4349 were observed. 11 stars were confirmed as
members, and 3 spectroscopic binaries were discovered: #79, 168 and 203
(Lohman 1961); orbital elements have
been determined for two of them. The eccentricity of #203 is small, but the
period is close to the cutoff period for circular orbits, which may explain the
observed value.
Both spectroscopic binaries discovered in NGC 5316, #3 and 204
(Rahim 1966), are non-members as their systemic
velocities (-54.4 and -7.2 km s-1) are far from the cluster mean velocity
of -15.1
0.3 km s-1. The velocities of all four members, #31, 35, 45
and 72, are constant over 4400 days. The zero binary frequency in NGC 5316 contrasts with the value of 75% observed in NGC 2437.
Both stars observed in NGC 5749, #7 and 29 (Clariá & Lapasset
1992), are non-members, and #7 is a binary.
This cluster was discussed by Mermilliod & Mayor (1990). Ten
spectroscopic binaries were discovered. The binary nature of star #201 is
not confirmed by the new observations. Four orbits were published by
Mermilliod et al. (1989) and two by Mermilliod et al. (1997a).
Continued monitoring of the binaries now permits us to determine orbits also for
the cluster members #4 and 276 (Bozkurt 1974), bringing the total number
of orbits to 8 of the 9 binaries known in this cluster. The binary rate is
remarkably high: 9/21 or 43%.
Nine stars were observed in NGC 5823, but only one, #1034 (#34 in Janes 1981)
is a probable member. It is a spectroscopic binary and first elements were published
by Mermilliod et al. (1989). Seven new observations were obtained and
the orbit improved.
In NGC 6124, we have observed #1, 14, 29, 33, 35, 36, 41, 233
(Koelbloed 1959). All stars are cluster members, and #29 and 33 are binaries
with orbit determinations.
Observations of 24 red giants in NGC 6134 have been analysed by
Clariá & Mermilliod (1992). Orbital elements for stars #8 and
34 were published by Mermilliod et al. (1997a); these elements have been
updated here. Preliminary elements were determined for star #204. The period is
short (59 days) and the orbit is circular.
Radial-velocity observations in NGC 6192 were analysed by Clariá
et al. (2006). Among the 10 stars observed, #9, 45, 91, 96 and 137
(Kilambi & Fitzgerald 1983) were found to be members. #91 and 96 are
spectroscopic binaries, and a preliminary orbit has been derived for #96.
The two red giants observed in NGC 6249, #154 and 179 (McSwain &
Gies 2005), are non-members, as their positions in the colour-magnitude
diagram are incompatible with the young age of the cluster (McSwain &
Gies 2005). No radial velocities for main-sequence stars exist. An orbit
has been determined for star #154.
Both red-giant members in NGC 6475 are spectroscopic binaries. A
circular orbit has been published for #134 (=HD 162391, Mermilliod et al. 1989). Star #58 (Koelbloed 1959; also known as HD 162587, HR 6658, and WDS17534-3454) is a close visual binary (separation 0
4)
composed of two red giants, one of which is a spectroscopic binary. The correlation
functions clearly show one variable-velocity component and another one, stable at
the cluster velocity. Thus, NGC 6475 must contain three red giants.
The photometry of #58 is that of the triple system.
This cluster contains the Cepheid EV Sct. Observations of 6 red giants in the
field were discussed by Mermilliod et al. (1987). The initial orbit for
#54 (Arp 1958) by Mermilliod et al. (1997a) has been slightly
improved.
Both giants observed, #14 and 23 (Madore & van den Bergh 1975) are
members, and #14 is also a binary.
Both stars observed, #2189 and 2191 (Carraro & Patat 1995) appear to be
non-members according to their positions in the colour-magnitude diagram. Their
mean velocities are quite different, and no radial-velocity data are available
for the main-sequence stars, so the systemic velocity of Rup 46 is unknown. Star #2191 is a spectroscopic binary, and the orbit was determined.
Ruprecht 79 was analysed by Mermilliod et al. (1987) because it
contains the Cepheid CS Vel. Star #2 (Moffat & Vogt 1975, #141 in
Topatkas 1981) is a binary. The systemic velocity confirms its
membership of the cluster.
We observed #19, 105, 122 and 201 (Terzan & Bernard 1981) in
Trumpler 26. #122 and 201 are members, and #201 is a binary with a
new orbit.
Among the 413 red giants observed, we found a total of 97 spectroscopic
binaries; as many as possible were monitored to determine the orbital elements.
Tables 6-8 present our orbital elements for 70 binaries in 31 open clusters with
.
No orbits could be determined for
the remaining 27 systems.
Again all systems are single-lined binaries with single the exception of NGC 6940-100, which is an SB2, although several systems must have mass ratios close to unity.
First orbital elements for 31 new spectroscopic binaries are presented in Table 6;
the corresponding radial-velocity curves are shown in Figs. 3 and 4.
Most new orbits have enough observations to characterise the radial-velocity curves completely, and most pertain to binaries in clusters which have not been discussed previously, mainly because they contain few red giants. As judged by their systemic velocities, a number of the red-giant binaries are in fact non-members, as discussed below.
Orbital elements for another 24 binaries have been published in earlier papers on CORAVEL data for red giants in northern clusters:
IC 4725 & NGC 129: Mermilliod et al. (1987),
IC 4756: Mermilliod & Mayor (1990),
NGC 752: Mermilliod et al. (1998),
NGC 2099: Mermilliod et al. (1996),
NGC 2539, NGC 2632, NGC 6633 & NGC 6940: Mermilliod & Mayor (1989).
For many of these systems, additional observations have been obtained since those papers.
In addition, the zero point of the radial velocities has been corrected (by 0.3-0.4 km s-1; see above) to bring them onto the CORAVEL radial-velocity system of Udry et al. (1999). When no new measurements have been obtained since the first publication, we have recomputed the orbits
with the corrected radial velocities. We do not show the radial-velocity curves again, because the changes are generally not visible on the plots.
Revised orbital elements for these systems are listed in Table 7, in the same format as Table 6. The changes are not large, but the errors are reduced.
A large number of CORAVEL observations were included in the determination of orbital elements of spectroscopic binaries in M67 (Mathieu et al. 1986) and NGC 129 (Gieren et al. 1994). The published results are reproduced here for these six stars.
For four binaries, vB 41 (Griffin et al. 1985) and vB 71 (Torres et al. 1997) in the Hyades and # 926 and 1223 in NGC 6705 (Lee et al. 1989), we recomputed the orbital elements with CORAVEL observations, which extends the number of cycles covered.
These new values are summarized in Table 8.
![\begin{figure}
\par\includegraphics[width=15.35cm,clip]{8007fig3.eps} \end{figure}](/articles/aa/full/2007/39/aa8007-07/Timg24.gif) |
Figure 3:
Radial-velocity curve for the first 20 red-giant northern binaries. |
| Open with DEXTER |
![\begin{figure}
\par\includegraphics[width=15.35cm,clip]{8007fig4.eps} \end{figure}](/articles/aa/full/2007/39/aa8007-07/Timg25.gif) |
Figure 4:
Radial-velocity curve for the remaining 11 red-giant northern binaries. |
| Open with DEXTER |
Many clusters in our observing program have not yet been discussed,
because earlier papers focused on objects with large numbers of red
giants (N > 10). These clusters are briefly discussed below, with
references to the star numberings used. These references should be
identical to those in the open-cluster data base WEBDA
(http://www.univie.ac.at/webda/).
Both orbits are well defined with 21 and 20 observations respectively,
and good phase coverage. Although the membership of the red giants
in Cr 463 is uncertain, both #55 and 73
(Townsed 1975) are certainly non-members.
Since the first analysis of the red giants in the field of IC 4725 by Mermilliod et al. (1987), additional measurements have
been obtained. They confirm the membership of the Cepheid U Sgr in the
cluster and improve the orbital elements of the spectroscopic binary #150 (Johnson 1960). The third red giant of the cluster, #251, has a constant radial velocity.
This cluster was discussed by Mermilliod & Mayor (1990), who discovered 3 spectroscopic binaries and determined an orbit for star #69 (Kopf 1943). The orbital
parameters for stars #80 and 139 include both the new CORAVEL
radial velocities and the observations obtained by Sperauskas (Table 2). Moreover, Sperauskas' data permitted us to compute an orbit
for star #25, a newly detected binary. Although the systemic radial velocity is close to the cluster mean value, it is probably a non-member because of its position in the
colour-magnitude diagram, nearly three magnitudes brighter than the clump.
The periods of star #80 and #139 are long, 15.8 yrs and 10.8 yrs
respectively, but at least one cycle has been well covered. A few
deviating points with residuals larger than 1.4 km s-1 (#80) and
1.0 km s-1 (#139) have been rejected from the orbit calculation
and are indicated with open symbols.
The bright giant Tr 91 (Trumpler 1938) in Mel 111 (Coma Berenices) is a well-known spectroscopic binary, classified as G7 III + A2.5 IV by Ginestet & Carquillat
(2002). An orbit was published by Vinter Hansen (1940) and Abt & Willmarth (1999). The orbital elements
given in Table 6 are based on CORAVEL observations
only, but confirm the previous results. The A-type star is not seen
in the CORAVEL cross-correlation function.
Early CORAVEL data for NGC 129
(Mermilliod et al. 1987) showed that the Cepheid variable DL Cas
and star #170 (Arp et al. 1959) were spectroscopic binaries,
and a first orbit was determined for #170. An extensive observing
program on DL Cas and star #170 was performed with several
instruments and resulted in an orbit for both DL Cas and
star #170 (Gieren et al. 1994). The published values are
reproduced in Table 8.
A detailed analysis of radial-velocity data for NGC 752,
spanning 18 years, was published by Mermilliod et al. (1998) who determined orbital elements for three binaries. The orbital elements in Table 7 include
numerous CORAVEL and CfA observations. With 85, 53 and 89 observations for stars #75, 110 and 208 respectively, the orbits are
very well determined. The observations obtained at CfA for H213
confirm the duplicity announced by Mermilliod et al. (1998),
but the period is over 20 000 days, i.e. more than 50 yr, so only
a fraction of the orbit has yet been covered.
Among the 3 red giants observed in NGC 1027, star #27 (Hoag
et al. 1961) is the only member. It is a binary with a long
period, 15.4 yrs, but the orbit is well covered thanks to the 15 measurements obtained at CfA.
Star #59 (Purgathofer 1964) is clearly a non-member of
NGC 1502, which is too young to possess this type of red
giant. With a period of 123
,
the circular orbit is expected
(Mermilliod & Mayor 1992).
Star #4 (Hoag et al. 1961) is the only spectroscopic binary
among the 3 red-giant members (#4, 5, 32) in NGC 1528. With 28 observations, the orbital elements are well defined. The system is located well inside the Hertzsprung gap in the
(V, B-V) colour-magnitude diagram. The photometric
separation gives
= (10.31, 1.28) and
=
(11.49, 0.27). The photometric mass ratio is 0.80. By assuming a
primary mass of 2.91
and with f(m) = 0.907, the only
solution at
= 1 gives M2 = 3.26
(minimum mass).
This suggests that the secondary is itself a binary, the mass of the
third star being at least 0.88
.
Thus, it contributes to the
mass, but not much to the total light of the secondary component. Star #5
is also within the Hertzsprung gap, although its colour is less blue;
with
= 0.008, it is a probable binary.
#98 (HD 27395) is a red star in the field of NGC 1545, noticed
at the telescope, but turned out to be a non-member; it is a spectroscopic
binary. Stars #3, 4 (Hoag et al. 1961) are members and constant,
while #26 is a non-member. Star #99 (HD 27276), is another red star
noticed at the telescope, and is a radial-velocity member. NGC 1545
would therefore has 3 single red-giant members.
Star #2 (Hoag et al. 1961) is the only red giant in the field
of NGC 1778 and most probably a member, judged by its position
in the colour-magnitude diagram. Its systemic velocity also agrees well
with that of the main-sequence stars by Liu et al.
(1988, 1989, 1991). The amplitude is small,
but the orbit is well defined.
Radial velocities of 55 red giants in NGC 2099 were
analysed by Mermilliod et al. (1996). 16 spectroscopic
binaries were discovered and 11 orbits determined, among which only 5
were found to be members. A period of P = 261
3 was determined
for star #412 (von Zeipel & Lindgren 1921). With 21 observations, we find that two periods (262
71 and 910
2) are possible and produce small
residuals, 0.41 and
0.27 km s-1 respectively. They are included in
Table 7 under the entries 412a and 412b, but the longer
period is preferred. A preliminary orbit has been obtained for star #748. Although the period is long (P > 15 000
), the
important phases of this eccentric orbit have been well covered, which
allows to determine preliminary elements. The orbits for the six
non-members have been updated.
Star #26 (Becker et al. 1976) is the only red giant in the
field of NGC 2215. Its position in the CM diagram is in
agreement with its membership. The observed colours (V = 10.54,
B-V = 1.13) show clear evidence of the companion. A deconvolution
with respect to Geneva isochrones for
= 8.50 gives the
following values
= (10.73, 1.41) and
=
(12.53, 0.29) for the red-giant primary and the main-sequence
secondary respectively, which corresponds to a mass ratio of 0.71. There are no radial-velocity data for main-sequence stars to compare with that of the red giant.
The orbit for star KW 428 in Praesepe (NGC 2632) was first
published by Mermilliod & Mayor (1989). Four additional
observations were obtained to better cover the phases between 0 and
0.2. The period has been improved.
The binary red giant #73 (Walker 1965) in NGC 2264
is not a member from the photometry, but the systemic velocity (25.8 km s-1) does not rule out membership: According to Fürész et al. (2006), the cluster mean velocity
is 22 km s-1. However, #73 can be neither an evolved red giant
nor a contracting star, so it is most probably a non-member.
Six among the 8 red giants observed in the field of NGC 2287
proved to be spectroscopic binaries. Orbits have been determined for
five of them: #21, 97, 102, 107 (Cox 1954) and 204, also
named #224 in Harris et al. (1993). #204 is a non-member.
Star #102 is located in the middle of the Hertzsprung gap,
indicating that the components have similar V magnitudes. The
photometric separation of the combined colours, (V, B-V) = (7.31,
0.58), gives
= (7.80, 1.15),
= (8.42,
-0.02), and a mass ratio of 0.92.
Star #4 (Clariá 1975) is the only probable red-giant member
among the four stars observed. It is a spectroscopic binary with a circular orbit
although the period is 300
,
in agreement with the result of Mermilliod & Mayor
(1996) that the cutoff period increases with mass.
The CORAVEL data for red giants in
NGC 2420, added to those by McClure & Woodsworth
(1990), Smith & Stuntzeff (1987), Liu & Janes
(1987) and Friel et al. (1989), permitted to compute a
first orbit for the BaII red giant #173 (Cannon &
Lloyd 1970), with a period of 1480
.
Five measurements
with residuals larger than 2.3 km s-1, mainly from Liu & Janes
(1987), were rejected from the orbit computation.
The orbital elements by McClure & Woodsworth (1990) for #250,
the other BaII giant in NGC 2420, have been improved with our new observations.
NGC 2420 was discussed in more detail by Mermilliod & Mayor (2007b).
An analysis of 13 red giants in NGC 2539 was published by
Mermilliod & Mayor (1989), who determined orbital elements for 3 spectroscopic binaries, #209 = P32, 223 = P38, 114 = P42, (numbers
from Lapasset et al. 2000). The trend of the residuals
showed that star #209 is in fact a triple system. Later
observations at CfA permitted us to improve the orbital
elements for the short-period system, #209a (P = 242
27) and
compute a preliminary orbit for the wide system #209b
(P
11 655
or
32 yr), shown in
Fig. 4. First orbits have been determined for two other red
giants (#233 = P44 and 663 = P21), considered as suspected binaries
in the 1989 paper. Open symbols denote measurements rejected from the
orbit computation.
Orbital elements have been determined for two of the three red-giant
binaries in NGC 2548, #1296 and 1560 (Li 1954). The
period of #1560, close to 40 yr, is preliminary because a complete
cycle has not been covered. The smallest residuals,
= 0.37
are found for orbital periods between 12 249 and 14 624 days; the
corresponding systemic velocities vary from 9.45 to 8.25 km s-1.
We adopt
= 8.25 km s-1 because the
cluster mean velocity is +7.7 km s-1. The period of the third
binary, #1260, is even longer (P
50 yr).
Observations of 8 red giants were analysed by Mermilliod & Mayor
(1989), who determined an orbit for star #70 (Kopff 1943).
Additional observations permitted to improve the parameters.
As for NGC 1528-4, the minimum mass for the secondary star (M2 =
2.97
)
as deduced from the mass function (f(m) = 0.807) is
larger than the estimated mass of the red giant (M1 = 2.71
).
The photometric separation gives masses of 2.71 and 2.10
for
the red-giant primary (V, B-V) = (8.53, 1.07) and main-sequence
secondary (V, B-V) = (9.76, 0.26), respectively. The primary again appears
to be at least 0.9
more massive than a single star, suggesting
that the system is in fact triple.
Star #303 (Hakkila et al. 1983), one of the two red giants in
the field of NGC 6709, is a binary and an orbit has been
determined. Both red giants are members.
Among the 11 stars observed in the field of NGC 6882, only one, #26 (Hoag et al. 1961), is a probable member. It is also
a binary, and its orbit has been determined.
Twenty red giants in the field of NGC 6940 were found to be members by Mermilliod & Mayor (1989). Six are spectroscopic
binaries, and their orbits were computed. 3-7 new measurements have been obtained and the orbital elements improved. Star #100 (Vasilevskis & Rach 1957) is the only double-lined spectroscopic binary among the 413 northern red
giants observed with CORAVEL. The secondary is not a red star, but most probably an Am star, as low rotation and numerous
metallic lines are necessary to produce a good correlation.
The 3 red giants observed in the field of NGC 7082, #163, 174, 197 (Hassan 1973), seem to be non-members.
#174 is a spectroscopic binary. An orbit has been determined.
Star #95 (Mävers 1940) is a spectroscopic binary and an orbit has been determined. The systemic velocity confirms its
membership in NGC 7209. In the (V, B-V) diagram, #95 is displaced
to the left of the isochrone by about 0.15 mag. Interpreting this as the effect of the MS companion, we computed
= (10.5, 1.32) and
= (12.76, 0.22) for the two stars from the combined photometry.
The mass ratio is 0.63 (1.87/2.97
).
Of the seven stars observed in the field of Stock 2, #11a, 17, 43, 82a, 109a, 120, 160 (Krzeminski & Serkowski 1967), four proved to
be binaries (#17, 43, 82a, 120). We obtained an orbit for #120 (Krzeminski & Serkowski 1967), which is clearly a non-member, however.
Among our 1309 cluster red giants (members and non-members), 289 are found
to be spectroscopic binaries. Orbits have so far been determined for only 156 of these, showing that the number of orbits could be more than double if the velocities of the rest of the known variables were kept under precise,
long-term monitoring. The binaries without orbits have long periods,
mostly above 13 years, and their orbital eccentricities are likely high. Thus,
we have not been able to obtain adequate coverage of the important phases within the assigned observing runs, especially in Chile.
The absolute error of a period depends on the number of cycles covered and is therefore larger for the long-period systems. However, the relative error of the period is below 1%, except for a few preliminary long-period orbits (Fig. 5).
![\begin{figure}
\par\includegraphics[width=7.7cm,clip]{8007fig5.eps} \end{figure}](/articles/aa/full/2007/39/aa8007-07/Timg34.gif) |
Figure 5:
Relation between the relative errors on the orbital period and the values of the period.
The periods are in days. |
| Open with DEXTER |
The binary frequency varies from cluster to cluster: some clusters with 4 red-giant members have 3 binaries while other, similar clusters have none.
Thus, the binary frequency may range from 0 to 100% (when a single
red giant member is also a binary). However, the small numbers of red giants
in the clusters studied do not allow firm conclusions on any variations in binary frequence among clusters.
Cluster binaries composed of a red-giant primary and an upper-main-sequence secondary can provide very useful independent
distance determinations for open clusters if both spectroscopic and interferometric orbits can be obtained. Moreover,
the chances of observing eclipses by these large stars may not be negligible. These techniques offer interesting prospects
for determining physical parameters of the components and performing direct comparisons with evolutionary models.
This paper summarises our determination of orbital elements for a large sample of red-giant spectroscopic binaries in galactic
open clusters, determined in a 20-year radial-velocity programme covering both hemispheres. This data set is the largest and
most homogeneous ever presented in the field of open-cluster (giant) binaries.
New orbital elements are presented for 67 binaries and improved elements for 64 systems, while published elements for a
further 25 binaries are summarised for completeness. The orbital periods range from 41.5 to 14 722 days (40 yr).
Another 133 spectroscopic binaries have been discovered during the observations, but their periods are generally of the order of decades.
The properties of this sample of 156 binary systems, and the full data for the all-sky sample of 1309 (single and double) giants
in 187 open clusters will be analysed in subsequent papers.
Acknowledgements
This project was made possible by large amounts of observing time and travel and other financial support from ESO, the Fonds National
Suisse pour la Recherche Scientifique, the Danish Natural Science Research Council, and the Danish Board for Astronomical Research.
It succeeded primarily thanks to the contributions of many colleagues, who patiently performed many observations and covered crucial
orbital phases. We are grateful to Dr J. Sperauskas (Astronomical Observatory of Vilnius University, Lithuania), for contributing
his observations of red giants in IC 4756. We are also grateful to Maxime Marmier (Geneva Observatory) for obtaining a radial velocity
for star #44 in NGC 2360. Last, but not least, we thank Dr Stephane Udry, in charge of the CORAVEL database,
for extracting the observations performed for this programme and for helping us to correct any problems in the database.
- Abt, H. A., &
Willmarth, D. W. 1999, ApJ, 521, 682 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Arp, H. C. 1958, ApJ,
128, 166 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Arp, H. C., Sandage, A.,
& Stephen, C. 1959, ApJ, 130, 80 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Baranne, A., Mayor, M., &
Poncet, J.-L. 1979, Vistas Astron., 23, 279 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Baranne, A., Queloz, D.,
Mayor, M., et al. 1996, A&AS, 119, 373 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] (In the text)
- Becker, W., Svolopoulos,
S. N., & Fang, C. 1976, Astron. Inst. Univ. Basel
(Katalogue)
(In the text)
- Bozkurt, S. 1974, Rev. Mex.
Astron. Astrofis., 1, 89 [NASA ADS] (In the text)
- Cannon, R. D., & Lloyd,
C. 1970, MNRAS, 150, 279 [NASA ADS] (In the text)
- Carraro, G., & Patat,
F. 1995, MNRAS, 276, 563 [NASA ADS] (In the text)
- Clariá, J. J. 1975,
A&AS, 9, 251 [NASA ADS] (In the text)
- Clariá, J. J., &
Lapasset, E. 1992, Acta Astron., 42, 343 [NASA ADS] (In the text)
- Clariá, J. J., &
Mermilliod, J.-C. 1992, A&A, 95, 429 [NASA ADS] (In the text)
- Clariá, J. J., Piatti,
A. E., Lapasset, E., & Mermilliod, J.-C. 2003, A&A, 399,
543 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] (In the text)
- Clariá, J. J.,
Mermilliod, J.-C., Piatti, A. E., & Parisi, M. C. 2006,
A&A, 453, 91 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] (In the text)
- Cox, A. N. 1954, ApJ,
119, 188 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Cuffey, J. 1938, Ann. Harv.
Coll. Obs., 106, 39 [NASA ADS] (In the text)
- Cuffey, J. 1941, ApJ, 94,
55 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Eigenbrod, A.,
Mermilliod, J.-C., Clariá, J. J., Andersen, J., & Mayor,
M. 2004, A&A, 423, 189 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] (In the text)
- Fernandez, J. A., &
Salgado, C. W. 1980, A&AS, 39, 11 [NASA ADS] (In the text)
- Friel, E. D. 1995,
ARA&A, 33, 381 [NASA ADS] (In the text)
- Friel, E. D., Liu, T.,
& Janes, K. A. 1989, PASP, 101, 1105 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Fürész, G.,
Hartmann, L. W., Szentgyorgyi, H., et al. 2006, ApJ, 648, 1090 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Gieren, W. P., Welch, D.
L., Mermilliod, J.-C., Matthews, J. M., & Hertling, G. 1994,
AJ, 107, 2093 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Gim, M., Hesser, J. E.,
McClure, R. D., & Stetson, P. B. 1998, PASP, 110, 1172 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Ginestet, N., &
Carquillat, J. M. 2002, ApJS, 143, 513 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Griffin, R. F., & Gunn,
J. E. 1977, AJ, 82, 176 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Griffin, R. F., Gunn, J.
E., Zimmerman, B. A., & Griffin, R. E. M. 1985, AJ, 90,
609 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Hakkila, J., Sanders, W.
L., & Schroeder, R. 1983, A&AS, 51, 541 [NASA ADS] (In the text)
- Hamdani, S., North, P.,
Mowlavi, N., Raboud, D., & Mermilliod, J.-C. 2000, A&A,
360, 509 [NASA ADS] (In the text)
- Harris, G. L. H.,
FitzGerald, M. P. V., Mehta, S., & Reed, B. C. 1993, AJ, 106,
153 [NASA ADS] (In the text)
- Hartwick, F. D. A., &
Hesser, J. E. 1974, ApJ, 192, 391 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Hassan, S. M. 1973,
A&AS, 9, 273 [NASA ADS] (In the text)
- Hoag, A. A., Johnson, H.
L., Iriarte, B., et al. 1961, Pub. USNO XVII, part VII
(In the text)
- Janes, K. A. 1981, AJ,
86, 1210 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Johnson, H. L. 1960, ApJ,
131, 620 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Kilambi, G. C., &
Fitzgerald, M. P. 1983, Bull. Astr. Soc. India, 11, 226 [NASA ADS] (In the text)
- Koelbloed, D. 1959, BAN,
14, 265 [NASA ADS] (In the text)
- Kopff, E. 1943, AN, 274,
69 [NASA ADS] (In the text)
- Krzeminski, W., &
Serkowski, K. 1967, ApJ, 147, 988 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Lapasset, E., Claria, J.
J., & Mermilliod, J.-C. 2000, A&A, 361, 945 [NASA ADS] (In the text)
- Latham, D. W. 1992, in
Complementary Approaches to Binary and Multiple Star Research, ed.
H. McAlister, & W. Hartkopf, IAU Coll. 135, ASPC, 32, 1000
(In the text)
- Lee, C. W., Mathieu, R.
D., & Latham, D. W. 1989, AJ, 97, 1710 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Li, H. 1954, Ann. Obs.
Astron. Zo-Se, 23, 1 [NASA ADS] (In the text)
- Lindoff, U. 1968, Ark.
Astr., 4, 587 [NASA ADS] (In the text)
- Lindoff, U. 1972, A&AS,
7, 231 [NASA ADS] (In the text)
- Lindoff, U., &
Johansson, K. 1968, Ark. Astron., 5, 45 [NASA ADS] (In the text)
- Liu, T., & Janes, K.
A. 1987, PASP, 99, 1076 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Liu, T., Janes, K. A.,
Bania, T. M., & Phelps, R. L. 1988, AJ, 95, 1122 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Liu, T., Janes, K. A.,
& Bania, T. M. 1989, AJ, 98, 626 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Liu, T., Janes, K. A.,
& Bania, T. M. 1991, AJ, 102, 1103 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Lohmann, W. 1961, AN, 286,
105 [NASA ADS] (In the text)
- Lyngå, G. 1959, Ark.
Astr., 2, 379 [NASA ADS] (In the text)
- Madore, B. F., & van
den Bergh, S. 1975, ApJ, 197, 55 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Mathieu, R. D., Latham, D.
W., Griffin, R. F., & Gunn, J. E. 1986, AJ, 92, 1100 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Mävers, F. W. 1940,
AN, 270, 201 [NASA ADS] (In the text)
- Mayor, M. 1985, in IAU Coll.
88, ed. A. G. D. Philip, & D. W. Latham, L. Davis Press (N.Y.:
Schenectady), 35
(In the text)
- McClure, R. D., &
Woodsworth, A. W. 1990, ApJ, 352, 709 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- McSwain, M. V., & Gies,
D. R. 2005, ApJS, 161, 118 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Meibom, S. 2000, A&A,
361, 929 [NASA ADS] (In the text)
- Meibom, S., Andersen, J.,
& Nordström, B. 2002, A&A, 386, 187 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] (In the text)
- Mermilliod, J.-C., &
Mayor, M. 1989, A&A, 219, 125 [NASA ADS] (In the text)
- Mermilliod, J.-C., &
Mayor, M. 1990, A&A, 237, 61 [NASA ADS] (In the text)
- Mermilliod, J.-C., &
Mayor, M. 1992, in Binaries as Tracers of Stellar Formation, ed. A.
Duquennoy, & M. Mayor (Cambridge Univ. Press), 183
(In the text)
- Mermilliod, J.-C., &
Mayor, M. 1996, ASP Conf. Ser., 109, 373 [NASA ADS] (In the text)
- Mermilliod, J.-C., &
Mayor, M. 1999, A&A, 237, 61 [NASA ADS] (In the text)
- Mermilliod, J.-C., &
Mayor, M. 2007a, in prep.
- Mermilliod, J.-C., &
Mayor, M. 2007b, A&A, 470, 919 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] (In the text)
- Mermilliod, J.-C., Mayor, M.,
& Burki, G. 1987, A&AS, 70, 389 [NASA ADS] (In the text)
- Mermilliod, J.-C., Mayor,
M., Andersen, J., et al. 1989, A&AS, 79, 11 [NASA ADS] (In the text)
- Mermilliod, J.-C.,
Andersen, J., Nordström, B. & Mayor, M. 1995, A&A,
299, 53 [NASA ADS] (In the text)
- Mermilliod, J.-C.,
Huestamendia, G., del Rio, G., & Mayor, M. 1996, A&A, 307,
80 [NASA ADS] (In the text)
- Mermilliod, J.-C.,
Andersen, J., & Mayor, M. 1997a, A&A, 319, 481 [NASA ADS] (In the text)
- Mermilliod, J.-C.,
Clariá, J. J., Andersen, J., & Mayor, M. 1997b, A&A,
324, 91 [NASA ADS] (In the text)
- Mermilliod, J.-C., Mathieu,
R. D., Latham, D. W., & Mayor, M. 1998, A&A, 339, 423 [NASA ADS] (In the text)
- Mermilliod, J.-C.,
Clariá, J. J., Andersen, J., Piatti, A. E., & Mayor, M.
2001, A&A, 375, 30 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] (In the text)
- Mermilliod, J.-C., Latham,
D. W., Glushkova, E. V., et al. 2003, A&A, 399, 105 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] (In the text)
- Moffat, A. F. J., &
Vogt, N. 1975, A&AS, 20, 85 [NASA ADS] (In the text)
-
Nordström, B., Andersen, J., & Andersen, M. I. 1997,
A&A, 322, 460 [NASA ADS] (In the text)
- Piatti, E., &
Clariá, J. J. 2001, A&A, 370, 931 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] (In the text)
- Piatti, A. E.,
Clariá, J. J., Ahumada, A. V., et al. 2004, A&A, 418,
979 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] (In the text)
- Purgathofer, A. 1964, Ann.
Univ. Sternw. Wien, 26, 37 (In the text)
- Rahim, M. A. 1966, AN,
289, 41 [NASA ADS] (In the text)
- Smith, V. V., &
Stuntzeff, N. B. 1987, AJ, 92, 359 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Sperauskas, J. 2005, Priv.
comm.
(In the text)
- Stefanik, R. P., Latham, D.
W., & Torres, G. 1999, in Precise Stellar Radial Velocities,
IAU Coll. 170, ed. J. B. Hearnshaw, & C. D. Scarfe, ASP Conf.
Ser., 185, 354
(In the text)
- Terzan, A., & Bernard,
A. 1981, A&AS, 46, 49 [NASA ADS] (In the text)
- Topaktas, L. 1981,
A&AS, 45, 111 [NASA ADS] (In the text)
- Torres, G., Stefanik, R. P.,
& Latham, D. W. 1997, ApJ, 485, 167 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Townsed, R. E. 1975,
PASP, 87, 753 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Trumpler, R. J. 1938,
LOB, 18, 167 (In the text)
- Udry, S., Mayor, M., &
Queloz, D. 1999, in Precise Stellar Radial Velocities, ed. J. B.
Hearnshaw, & C. D. Scarfe, IAU Coll. 170, ASP Conf. Ser., 185,
367
(In the text)
- Upgren, A., Sperauskas,
J., & Boyle, R. P. 2002, Baltic Astron., 11, 91 [NASA ADS] (In the text)
- Vasilevskis, S., &
Rach, R. A. 1957, AJ, 62, 175 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- VinterHansen, J. M. 1940,
LOB, 19, 101 (In the text)
- Vogt, N., & Moffat, A.
F. J. 1973, A&AS, 9, 97 [NASA ADS] (In the text)
- von Zeipel, H., &
Lindgren, J. 1921, Kungl. Sven. Vet. Handl., 61, 15 (In the text)
- Walker, M. F. 1956, ApJS,
2, 365 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
Copyright ESO 2007