**Table 8:** Adopted frequency-solution based on the weighted analyses of the sets "B All'' and "V All''.
Freq.	Freq.	Error	S/N	R (%)	S/N	R (%)
Id.	( $d^{\rm -1}$ )	( $d^{\rm -1}$ )	Filter B		Filter V
F1	19.747258	0.000013	41.4	51	44.6	50
F2	12.104912	0.000019	24.5	75	20.0	71
F3	9.622399	0.000078	8.3	76	7.3	72
F4	14.271621^a	0.000059	6.9	79	4.9	73
F5	8.910976^a	0.000083	7.6	81	6.9	75
F6	2.000229^b	0.000075	5.6	82	-	-
F7	8.69806^a	0.00011	5.6	83	6.3	76
F8	8.10529^a	0.00012	4.6	84	6.2	78
S12	31.85217	0.00014	6.9	84.6	3.3	78.0

^a These values may be affected by the 1 $d^{\rm -1}$ (and 0.003 $d^{\rm -1}$ ) aliasing i.e. 15.275, 9.698 and 9.105 $d^{\rm -1}$ give equally good fits. Preference was given to a solution with 14.272 (since marginally found in the Hipparcos data), 8.911 $d^{\rm -1}$ (peak convincingly detected in "B All'') and 8.698 (peak convincingly detected in "V All'').
^b This frequency was not found in "V All'', but there is an unsignificant peak at 2.89 or 3.89 $d^{\rm -1}$ .

Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text