All Figures

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=15.5cm,height=8cm,clip]{6299fig1.ps}\end{figure}$ Figure 1: Radio spectra of the 5 selected targets. Shown are the new results, results taken from the literature, upper limits, the predicted thermal flux (Eq. (1), dashed line), the predicted thermal flux accounting for clumping (Puls et al. 2006, dotted line), and a fit to the observations (solid line). Distances used for estimating the thermal flux are the same as those used for the determination of the mass-loss rates using H $\alpha$ .
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.4cm,clip]{6299fig2.eps}\end{figure}$ Figure 2: Our 21 cm $\xi$ Per observation of 2005. The sources A and B of Bohnenstengel & Wendker (1976) are indicated, as are $\xi$ Per and a new source that they did not detect (see Sect. 3.1).
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.4cm,clip]{6299fig2.eps}\end{figure}$	Figure 2: Our 21 cm $\xi$ Per observation of 2005. The sources A and B of Bohnenstengel & Wendker (1976) are indicated, as are $\xi$ Per and a new source that they did not detect (see Sect. 3.1).
Open with DEXTER