All Figures

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8cm,clip]{7175fig1.eps} \end{figure}$ Figure 1: Relationship between various parameters in the complete f-sample: a) mean velocity and angular width; b) mean velocity and largest measured distance; c) angular width and the distance of the source region from the disc center; d) mean velocity and the 1-8 Å peak flux of the associated SXR flare. Black circles represent halo-CMEs. Linear least-square fit parameters are given in the insets (black - complete sample, gray - non-halo CMEs, C is the correlation coefficient). The statistical significance of all correlations is greater than 99.99%.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=7cm,clip]{7175fig2.eps} \end{figure}$ Figure 2: a) CME mean velocities $v_{\rm m}$ versus the source-region position $\rho$ , shown for the complete non-halo f-sample. b) Contour-plot of the 2-dimensional distribution of the data-points displayed in a). c) Mean velocities versus $\rho$ for the complete non-halo p-sample. The parameters of the linear least-square fit (bold-black lines) in a) and c) are shown in the insets. The thin and dashed lines outline the decreasing trend of the velocity range towards the disc center.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8cm,clip]{7175fig3.eps} \end{figure}$ Figure 3: The correlation between mean velocities and the source-region position for: a) non-halo f-sample restricted to $\vert a\vert<5$ m s^-2 and $R_{\rm e}>10$ .; b) non-halo p-sample restricted to $\vert a\vert<10$ m s^-2. The least-square fit parameters are given in the insets. Statistical significances are P>99.95% and P>99.97%, respectively. Bold lines represent the linear least-square fit, whereas thin and dashed lines outline the "upper limit'' trend like in Figs. 2a and 2c.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=7.8cm,clip]{7175fig4.eps} \end{figure}$ Figure 4: The correlation between mean velocities and the source-region position for the reduced non-halo CME samples shown in Fig. 3, divided in W-bin subsamples: a) f-sample ( $30^{\circ }\le W<60^{\circ }$ - black dots and black-thick line, $60^{\circ }\le W<90^{\circ }$ - gray triangles and gray-thick line, $90^{\circ }\le W<120^{\circ }$ - crosses and gray-dashed line); b) the p-sample ( $W<60^{\circ }$ - black, $60^{\circ }\le W<120^{\circ }$ - gray). The least-square fit parameters are given in the insets.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=7.8cm,clip]{7175fig5.eps} \end{figure}$ Figure 5: Comparison of the empirical and the model-based correction factors $\kappa (\rho )$ . a) Empirical values based on f-subsamples shown in Fig. 4a ( $30^{\circ }\le W<60^{\circ }$ thick, $60^{\circ }\le W<90^{\circ }$ thin, and $90^{\circ }\le W<120^{\circ }$ dashed; mean widths are written by the curves). b) Correction factors derived from the cone model B by employing mean widths of CME subsamples shown in a). c) Empirical correction factors based on p-subsamples shown in Fig. 4b ( $W<60^{\circ }$ - black-thick, $60^{\circ }\le W<120^{\circ }$ - black-thin) compared with the correction factors based on the cone model B calculated for the corresponding mean widths (gray thick and thin lines, respectively).
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.2cm,clip]{7175fig6.eps} \end{figure}$ Figure 6: The ratio of the plane-of-sky velocity v and the true velocity v^*, presented as a function of the source-region position, derived from a) model A, b) model B, c) model C.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.2cm,clip]{7175fig6.eps} \end{figure}$	Figure 6: The ratio of the plane-of-sky velocity v and the true velocity v^*, presented as a function of the source-region position, derived from a) model A, b) model B, c) model C.
Open with DEXTER