All Tables

Table 1: Photometry of the selected ERO subsample in Abell 1835 and AC 114 taken from Hempel et al. (2007, Paper II). All magnitudes are given in the Vega system. For conversion to the AB system see the filter properties listed in Table 3. Non-detections (lower limits) are 1 $\sigma$ values. NA stands for non-available.
Table 2: IRAC and MIPS 24 $\mu$ m photometry of the EROs listed in Table 1 taken from Paper I. All fluxes are given in $\mu$ Jy. Upper limits are 1-sigma noise values at the position of the sources. Due to source blending the data is uncomplete, i.e. not available for objects A1835-#3, A1835-#10, and A1835-#11, and partially for A1835-#1.
Table 3: Properties of the photometric filters used for the SED fitting of objects in the field of A1835 and of AC114. For AC114 alternate filters are listed in parenthesis and SZ observations are not available (entry NA). Column 1 indicates the filter name, Col. 2 the effective wavelength in micron, Col. 3 the effective bandpass (filter "width'') in micron computed with a Gaussian approximation. AB corrections ( $C_{\rm AB}$ ), defined by $m_{\rm AB}=m_{\rm Vega} + C_{\rm AB}$ , are listed in Col. 3. Detailed information on the photometry can be found in Paper II.
Table 4: Magnification factors $\mu$ from the lensing models of A1835 and AC114 predicted for various source redshifts $z_{\rm s}$ . The values of $\mu$ are dimensionless magnification factors, and not in magnitudes.
Table 5: Derived/estimated properties for optical dropout ERO galaxies with near-IR and Spitzer detections. Listed are the object ID (Col. 1), the photometric redshift estimate (Col. 2), the extinction (Col. 3), the type of the best fit template (Col. 4), the distance modulus corresponding to $z_{\rm phot}$ (Col. 5), the absolute $K\rm s$ -band magnitude non-corrected for lensing (Col. 6), the absolute rest-frame $K\rm s$ -band magnitude non-corrected for lensing (Col. 7), the estimated stellar mass (from scaling the SED fit or from $M^{\rm rest}(K\rm s)$ assuming L_K/M=3.2, Col. 8), the estimated star formation rate non-corrected for lensing (Col. 9), and the age of the stellar population (Col. 10). To correct the above mentioned absolute quantities for gravitational magnification the appropriate magnification factors listed in Table 4 must be used.
Table 6: Same as Table 5 for optical dropout ERO galaxies detected only in the near-IR (no Spitzer photometry available). No information is listed for A1835-#11 due to its highly uncertain photometric redshift.
Table 7: Same as Table 5 for the HUDF-J2 galaxy from Mobasher et al. (2005). To the best of our knowledge no lensing correction has to be applied to this object ( $\mu =1$ ).
Table 8: Derived/estimated properties for IRAC selected EROs from Yan et al. (2004) from Hyperz fits with Bruzual & Charlot templates with different star formation histories, and computed assuming a minimum error of 0.1 mag in all bands. Note: all magnitudes are in the Vega system ( $M(K{\rm s})_{\rm Vega} = M(K{\rm s})_{\rm AB} - 1.871$ ).