All Tables

Table 1: Results of different procedures of interloper removal in terms of the fraction of removed interlopers $f_{\rm i}$ , the fraction of halo particles incorrectly identified as interlopers $f_{\rm g}$ and the fraction of non-identified interlopers remaining in the final sample of halo members $f_{\rm h}$ . The table lists both the mean values $\langle f\rangle$ and the dispersions $\sigma _{\rm f}$ of the parameters obtained in the analysis of 30 mock velocity diagrams. For all seven methods of interloper removal considered in Sect. 3 results are quantified for three different definitions of interlopers, particles beyond $r_{\rm v}$ or $2r_{\rm v}$ and unbound particles, as marked in the second column (interloper type - i/t) by $r_{\rm v}$ , $2r_{\rm v}$ and $v_{\rm esc}$ respectively.
Table 2: Probabilities ( $\alpha _{\rm p}$ and $\bar{\alpha}$ ) of finding a halo particle on the velocity diagram estimated via indirect methods of interloper treatment. $F_{<v_{\rm esc}}$ and $F_{<2r_{\rm v}}$ are fractions of bound particles and particles within $2r_{\rm v}$ respectively.