All Figures

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=9.0cm]{6367_fig1.ps}\end{figure}$ Figure 1: VLT/FORS2 (top) and NTT/SUSI2 (bottom) light curves folded at the best phase and period. The best-fit transit curve is superimposed (solid line).
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=9.0cm]{6367_fig2.ps}\end{figure}$ Figure 2: The VLT/FORS2 light curve obtained in this analysis with DECPHOT (filled circles) compared to the one obtained in Paper I using an image subtraction procedure (open circles).
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=9.0cm]{6367_fig3.ps}\end{figure}$ Figure 3: VLT/FORS2 light curves for OGLE-TR-132b and obtained with the same reduction procedure as in Paper I, using 4 different apertures. The best-fit transit curve obtained after reduction with DECPHOT is superimposed (solid line).
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=9.0cm]{6367_fig4.ps}\end{figure}$ Figure 4: The VLT/FORS2 light curves obtained in this analysis with, from top to bottom, DAOPHOT aperture photometry, ISIS + aperture photometry using 2 different apertures, obtained by J.D.H. using his own ISIS-based procedure, and with DECPHOT. The curves are shifted vertically for clarity. The best-fit transit curve obtained after reduction with DECPHOT is superimposed (solid line). See text for further details.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=12.0cm]{6367_fig5.ps}\end{figure}$ Figure 5: Left: OGLE-TR-132 (marked with a cross) in a 256 pixels $\times$ 256 pixels sub-image (0.51 $\hbox {$^\prime $ }$ $\times$ 0.51 $\hbox {$^\prime $ }$ ) from the best seeing VLT/FORS2 image of the run ( ${\it top}$ = North, ${\it left}$ = East). Right: deconvolved image.
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.0cm]{6367_fig6.ps}\end{figure}$ Figure 6: OGLE data folded at the best phase and period from the VLT and NTT light curves, with the best-fit transit curve superimposed (solid line).
Open with DEXTER

In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=9.0cm]{6367_fig1.ps}\end{figure}$	Figure 1: VLT/FORS2 (top) and NTT/SUSI2 (bottom) light curves folded at the best phase and period. The best-fit transit curve is superimposed (solid line).
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=9.0cm]{6367_fig2.ps}\end{figure}$	Figure 2: The VLT/FORS2 light curve obtained in this analysis with DECPHOT (filled circles) compared to the one obtained in Paper I using an image subtraction procedure (open circles).
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=9.0cm]{6367_fig3.ps}\end{figure}$	Figure 3: VLT/FORS2 light curves for OGLE-TR-132b and obtained with the same reduction procedure as in Paper I, using 4 different apertures. The best-fit transit curve obtained after reduction with DECPHOT is superimposed (solid line).
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=12.0cm]{6367_fig5.ps}\end{figure}$	Figure 5: Left: OGLE-TR-132 (marked with a cross) in a 256 pixels $\times$ 256 pixels sub-image (0.51 $\hbox {$^\prime $ }$ $\times$ 0.51 $\hbox {$^\prime $ }$ ) from the best seeing VLT/FORS2 image of the run ( ${\it top}$ = North, ${\it left}$ = East). Right: deconvolved image.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.0cm]{6367_fig6.ps}\end{figure}$	Figure 6: OGLE data folded at the best phase and period from the VLT and NTT light curves, with the best-fit transit curve superimposed (solid line).
Open with DEXTER