![]() |
Figure 1:
Various features observed
on the solar disk near the west limb by different instruments early
on October 26, 2003: a) H![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 2: Plot of the GOES X-ray flux in the lower energy channel (1-8 Å) versus time on October 26, 2003. The horizontal solid lines mark the time interval when the CMEs are visible in the field of view of LASCO C2. The onset time of the eruption of filaments F1 and F2, as well as that of the X1.2 X-ray flare are indicated by F1, F2, and X respectively. No on-disk activity associated with CME3 was detected. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 3:
EIT and LASCO C2/C3 time sequence of Event 1. The EIT 195 Å images ( upper two rows) show the eruptive process of filament F1 (indicated by arrow F1) in the lower corona. The WICE technique
was used to enhance fine structures of filaments and flare ribbons.
When the filament F1 reached certain height, flare-ribbons appeared
at the two sides of the place where F1 used to sit (indicated by the
arrow R1). They later connected themselves by loops (indicated by
the arrow L1). The LASCO C2 and C3 white light images ( lower two
rows) show the development of CME1 between 2 and 30 ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 4:
a) Height-time, b) velocity-time, and
c) acceleration-time profiles of CME1 leading edge (
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 5: EIT and LASCO C2/C3 time sequence of Event 2. The EIT 195 Å images ( two upper rows) show the eruption of filament F2 (indicated by the arrow F2) in the lower corona. Two flare ribbons (indicated by the arrow R2) and a group of post-flare loops (indicated by the arrow L2) appeared near the location where the F2 sat. The LASCO C2 and C3 running difference images ( two lower rows) show how CME2 (arrow marked CME2) expanded and interacted with the core of CME1 (arrow marked F1) and the leading edge of CME1 (arrow marked CME1). |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 6:
a) Height-time, b) velocity-time, and c) acceleration-time profiles
of 1) F2 in the FOV of i) EIT 195 Å (![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 7: LASCO C2 ( upper two rows) and C3 ( bottom row) time sequence of the disruption of a helmet streamer on October 26, 2003. The white arrows in a)- f) indicate the expanding part (leg) of the streamer, while the shape and profile of the other leg remained almost unchanged (white arrow in h)). The angular span of the CME-associated magnetic arcade is marked by two straight lines in the C3 frames. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 8:
a) Height-time, b) velocity-time, and c) acceleration-time profile of CME3 appearing in FOV of C2 (![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 9: Time sequence of the X1.2 X-ray flare on AR 10484 as recorded in EIT 195 Å. The images have been contrast-enhanced with the WICE technique. a)- d) The sudden brightenings (arrow P) indicate small scale activity during more than ten hours prior to the X1.2 flare. e)- f) The small scale eruption-like activity appeared about half hour before the X1.2 flare occurred. g)- l) The evolution of flare ribbons (indicated by arrow R1 and R2 ) after the X-ray flare. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 10:
Time sequence of the CME (CME4) associated with the X1.2 flare
as recorded by the MK4 coronagraph. The white arrows indicate the leading
edge of CME4. a) The leading edge started to form at 17:28 UT. b) The
leading edge of CME4 clearly formed at 17:31 UT. c) The angular span
of CME4 increased significantly within 6 min. d) The angular span of
CME4 reached about
![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 11:
Time-profiles of the altitude a), velocity b) and
acceleration c) of the CME4 leading edge appearing in FOV of MK4 (+), C2 (![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 12: Plot of CME speeds versus their angular widths. |
Open with DEXTER |