All Tables

Table 1: Typical OBs used in the observations for the DPS optical survey. The table gives: in Col. 1 the passband; in Col. 2 the filter id adopting the unique naming convention of the La Silla Science Operations Team; in Col. 3 the number of exposures in the OB; in Col. 4 the integration time of the individual sub-exposures in the OB; and in Col. 5 the total exposure time in seconds.
Table 2: Number of nights with different types of photometric solution. The table gives in Col. 1 the passband; in Col. 2 the filter identification; in Col. 3 the number of default solutions (corresponding to the number of non-photometric nights and/or nights without standard star observations); in Cols. 4-6 the number of nights with 1-, 2- or 3-parameter fits, respectively; and in Col. 7 the total number of nights in which standard star observations were carried out with a given filter.
Table 3: Type of photometric solution per passband for each observed DPS field. The table gives: in Col. 1 the region; in Col. 2 the field; in Cols. 3-6 the type of best solution available for a given passband.
Table 4: Median values for all photometric solutions based on 3-parameter fits. The table lists: in Col. 1 the passband/filter; in Cols. 2-4 the median zeropoint in Vega System (Zp), extinction, (k), and color term (color) values for all 3-parameter fit solutions.
Table 5: Comparison between EIS and Telescope Team solutions. The table lists: in Col. 1 the passband; in Cols. 2-4 the offsets (EIS-Telescope Team) of the zeropoint, extinction and color term.
Table 6: Average parameters for all photometric solutions and constraining the sample to the 3-parameter fits. The table gives: in Col. 1 the passband/filter combination; in Col. 2 the median zeropoint in Vega System (Zp) including solutions obtained from fits with an arbitrary number of free parameters; in Col. 3 the scatter computed from the distribution of zeropoints (rms); in Col. 4 the largest offset of a night calibration relative to the median reported, $(\Delta Zp)_{\max}$ ; in Cols. 5-7 the same as in the three previous columns, except that now the estimate of the median is computed using only 3-parameter fits.
Table 7: Distribution of grades per passband. The table gives: in Col. 1 the passband; in Col. 2 the ESO filter number; in Col. 3 the number of images; in Cols. 4-7 the ratio of images in a given grade to the total number of images taken with that filter.
Table 8: Grades and comments for stacked images with an associated comment. The table, ordered by increasing grade, lists: in Col. 1 the field name; in Col. 2 the passband; in Col. 3 the grade; and in Col. 4 the associated comment.
Table 9: Grades assigned to the DPS stacked images as a function of the passband. The table gives: in Col. 1 the passband; in Col. 2 the ESO filter number; in Col. 3 the total number of stacked images for each passband; in Cols. 4-7 the ratio of images with a given grade to the total number of images taken with that filter.
Table 10: Number of reduced images and number of independent nights for each field and passband. The table gives for each field: in Col. 1 the region; in Col. 2 the field name; in Cols. 3-9 the number of reduced images, and in parenthesis, the number of independent nights for each passband.
Table 11: Overview of the attributes of the produced image stacks and survey completeness. The table gives: in Col. 1 the field name; in Col. 2 the passband; in Col. 3 the filter identification; in Col. 4 the total integration time $T_{ \rm int}$ in seconds, of the final stack; in Col. 5 the number of contributing reduced images or RBs; in Col. 6 the total number of science frames contributing to the final stack; in Cols. 7 and 8 the seeing in arcseconds and the point-spread function (PSF) anisotropy measured in the final stack; in Col. 9 the limiting magnitude, $m_{\rm lim}$ , estimated for the final image stack for a 2 $^{\prime \prime }$ aperture, $5\sigma$ detection limit in the Vega system; in Col. 10 the grade assigned to the final image during visual inspection (ranging from A to D); in Col. 11 the fraction (in percentage) of observing time relative to that originally planned.
Table 12: Grades for source lists with associated comment. The table, ordered by increasing grade, lists: in Col. 1 the EIS field name; in Col. 2 the passband; in Col. 3 the grade; and in Col. 4 the associated comment.