All Figures

$\begin{figure}\includegraphics[angle=270,width=17cm,clip]{figure-ter} \end{figure}$ Figure 1: Top row: results for MWC 480. From left to right: 2.8 mm continuum image. The angular resolution is $1.09 \times 0.74$ at PA $28^\circ$ , and the contour spacing is 1 mJy/beam (0.13 K, about 3.5 $\sigma$ ). The 1.4 mm continuum image: the angular resolution is $0.73 \times 0.53$ at PA $33^\circ$ , and the contour spacing is 5 mJy/beam (0.33 K, $2.5 \sigma$ ). The 1.4 mm residual from the best fit with the same contours. Right: 1.4 mm real part of the visibility vs. baseline lengths. The points and error bars represent the measured values, and the curve indicates the visibilities of the best-fit disk model. The visibilities have been corrected from the disk orientation and inclination by compressing the V value by $\cos~(i)$ prior to circular averaging. Bottom row: results for LkCa 15. The 2.8 mm image is obtained by considering baselines longer than 200 m (but no flux was lost in this process). The resolution is $1.06 \times 0.61$ at PA $31^\circ$ , and the contour spacing is 0.75 mJy/beam (0.12 K, 2 $\sigma$ ). The 1.4 mm resolution is $0.66 \times 0.39$ at PA $55^\circ$ , and the contour spacing is 1.5 mJy/beam (or 0.15 K, 1.7 $\sigma$ ). The crosses indicate the position, orientation, and aspect ratio of the disks.
Open with DEXTER

In the text