Table 1:
Observed double white dwarfs discussed in this paper. The table shows for each system the orbital period
,
the orbital separation
,
the masses M1 and M2, the mass ratio q2 = M2/M1,
the estimated cooling age of the youngest white dwarf
and the difference between the cooling ages of the
components
.
M1 is the mass of the oldest white dwarf and
thus presumably the original primary. The errors on the periods are smaller than the last digit. The values for
are
calculated by the authors and meant to give an indication.
References:
(1) Saffer et al. (1988);
(2) Bergeron et al. (1989);
(3) Bragaglia et al. (1990);
(4) Marsh (1995);
(5) Moran et al. (1997);
(6) Moran et al. (1999);
(7) Maxted et al. (2000);
(8) Bergeron & Liebert (2002);
(9) Maxted et al. (2002a);
(10) Maxted et al. (2002b);
(11) Napiwotzki et al. (2002);
(12) Karl et al. (2003a);
(13) Karl et al. (2003b).
Note: (a) WD 1704+481a is the close pair of a hierarchical triple. It seems unclear which of the two stars in this pair is the youngest
(see the text).
Name |
(d) |
( ) |
M1 ( ) |
M2 ( ) |
q2 = M2/M1 |
(Myr) |
(Myr) |
Ref/Note |
WD 0135-052 |
1.556 |
5.63 |
0.52
0.05 |
0.47
0.05 |
0.90
0.04 |
950 |
350 |
1, 2 |
WD 0136+768 |
1.407 |
4.98 |
0.37 |
0.47 |
1.26
0.03 |
150 |
450 |
3, 10 |
WD 0957-666 |
0.061 |
0.58 |
0.32 |
0.37 |
1.13
0.02 |
25 |
325 |
3, 5, 6, 10 |
WD 1101+364 |
0.145 |
0.99 |
0.33 |
0.29 |
0.87
0.03 |
135 |
215 |
4, (10) |
PG 1115+116 |
30.09 |
46.9 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.84
0.21 |
60 |
160 |
8, 9 |
WD 1204+450 |
1.603 |
5.72 |
0.52 |
0.46 |
0.87
0.03 |
40 |
80 |
6, 10 |
WD 1349+144 |
2.209 |
6.65 |
0.44 |
0.44 |
1.26
0.05 |
- |
- |
12 |
HE 1414-0848 |
0.518 |
2.93 |
0.55
0.03 |
0.71
0.03 |
1.28
0.03 |
1000 |
200 |
11 |
WD 1704+481a |
0.145 |
1.13 |
0.56
0.07 |
0.39
0.05 |
0.70
0.03 |
725 |
-20 |
7, a |
HE 2209-1444 |
0.277 |
1.89 |
0.58
0.08 |
0.58
0.03 |
1.00
0.12 |
900 |
500 |
13 |
Source LaTeX |
All tables |
In the text