Table 1: Observed double white dwarfs discussed in this paper. The table shows for each system the orbital period $P_{\rm orb}$, the orbital separation  $a_{\rm orb}$, the masses M1 and M2, the mass ratio q2 = M2/M1, the estimated cooling age of the youngest white dwarf $\tau _2$ and the difference between the cooling ages of the components $\Delta \tau $. M1 is the mass of the oldest white dwarf and thus presumably the original primary. The errors on the periods are smaller than the last digit. The values for $a_{\rm orb}$ are calculated by the authors and meant to give an indication. References: (1) Saffer et al. (1988); (2) Bergeron et al. (1989); (3) Bragaglia et al. (1990); (4) Marsh (1995); (5) Moran et al. (1997); (6) Moran et al. (1999); (7) Maxted et al. (2000); (8) Bergeron & Liebert (2002); (9) Maxted et al. (2002a); (10) Maxted et al. (2002b); (11) Napiwotzki et al. (2002); (12) Karl et al. (2003a); (13) Karl et al. (2003b). Note: (a) WD 1704+481a is the close pair of a hierarchical triple. It seems unclear which of the two stars in this pair is the youngest (see the text).
Name $P_{\rm orb}$ (d) $a_{\rm orb}$ ($R_\odot$) M1 ($M_\odot $) M2 ($M_\odot $) q2 = M2/M1 $\tau _2$ (Myr) $\Delta \tau $ (Myr) Ref/Note
WD 0135-052 1.556 5.63 0.52 $\pm $ 0.05 0.47 $\pm $ 0.05 0.90 $\pm $ 0.04 950 350 1, 2
WD 0136+768 1.407 4.98 0.37 0.47 1.26 $\pm $ 0.03 150 450 3, 10
WD 0957-666 0.061 0.58 0.32 0.37 1.13 $\pm $ 0.02 25 325 3, 5, 6, 10
WD 1101+364 0.145 0.99 0.33 0.29 0.87 $\pm $ 0.03 135 215 4, (10)
PG 1115+116 30.09 46.9 0.7 0.7 0.84 $\pm $ 0.21 60 160 8, 9
WD 1204+450 1.603 5.72 0.52 0.46 0.87 $\pm $ 0.03 40 80 6, 10
WD 1349+144 2.209 6.65 0.44 0.44 1.26 $\pm $ 0.05 - - 12
HE 1414-0848 0.518 2.93 0.55 $\pm $ 0.03 0.71 $\pm $ 0.03 1.28 $\pm $ 0.03 1000 200 11
WD 1704+481a 0.145 1.13 0.56 $\pm $ 0.07 0.39 $\pm $ 0.05 0.70 $\pm $ 0.03 725 -20 7, a
HE 2209-1444 0.277 1.89 0.58 $\pm $ 0.08 0.58 $\pm $ 0.03 1.00 $\pm $ 0.12 900 500 13


Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text