\begin{table}%t1
      \caption{Journal of RV data: the telescopes and spectrographs with which the RVs were obtained, denoted by the running numbers in column "Spg. No.'', are as follows:
 1... James Lick 0.91-m refractor,  Mills~3-prism~spg, phot. plates;
 2... Yerkes 1.02-m refractor, Bruce 1-prism~spg. phot. plates;
 3... DAO Plaskett 1.8-m reflector, Cass.~IM or IS~prism spgs., phot. plates;
 4... Mt.~Wilson  Hooker 2.54-m reflector, coud\'e grating spg., 114-inch camera, phot. plates;
14... Mt~Wilson  Hooker 2.54-m reflector, coud\'e grating spg., 32-inch camera, phot. plates;
 5... IUE~satellite 0.45-m reflector, Cass. echelle spgs.,
 SWP, LWP and LWR~SEC  Vidicon cameras;
 6... CTIO 1-m reflector, Cass.  spg., image tube \&  phot. plates;
 7...~MJUO~McLellan 1-m reflector, Cass. fiber fed echelle spg., Reticon 1872;
 8... SAAO 1.9-m reflector, Cass spg., image tube \& intensified Reticon;
 9... DAO McKellar 1.2-m reflector, coud\'e spg., SITe-4 4096~$\times$ 2048~CCD;
10... Ond\v{r}ejov 2-m reflector, coud\'e spg., SITe-005 800~$\times$ 2000~CCD.}\label{jourv}
\small%\centerline
{
\begin{tabular}{rclrcrll}
\hline\hline
 Spg.  & Time interval  & No. of lines & No. of & Dispersion& Resolution & Weight&   Source\\
 No.   & (HJD-2~400~000)  &  measured  &  RVs   & (\Ame)     &         &       &         \\
\hline
  1    &  13~742.8--20~256.0& 15--25     &   36   &            &         &  1.025  &    \citet{wilson13}\\
  2    &  17~843.6--19~295.6& tens     &   24   &  30        &   5000      & 0.716   &     \citet{frost}\\
  3    &  24~127.5--24~714.8&  $\geq$30     &   24   &  29\&49    &   5000     & 0.688   &     \citet{plaskett26}\\
  4    &  29~500--31~715    &tens to hundred     &    7   &  2.8       & 10000        &  0.940  &\citet{green47}$^{{a}}$\\
 14    &  30~926--31~004    & hundreds     &    3   &  20        &      5000   &0.701    &\citet{green46}$^{{a}}$\\
  4    &  31~990--34~975    & hundreds     &   10   &  2.8       &    10000     & 0.940   &\citet{hack63}$^{{a}}$\\
  5    & 43~620.7--46~345.1 & cross-correlation &   31   &$\sim$ 1     &  12000       &1.164    &\citet{dudley90}\\
  6    & 44~422.7--44~810.8 & cross-correlation &     6  &  43        & 3000        & 0.837   &\citet{jeffery87}\\
  7    & 47~273.7--48~950.4 & tens(?) near \ha  & 33     & 2.0        & 45000        &1.863    &\citet{frame}$^{{b}}$\\
  8    & 47~312.5--47~314.5 & cross-correlation &  2     & 30?        & 5000        &1.043    &\citet{dudley90}\\
  9    & 53~587.8--53~651.6 &  2         & 14     & 10.1       & 18000   &0.765    &this paper\\
 10    & 53~594.4--53~674.2 &  2          & 21     & 17.2       & 10000   &1.380    &this paper\\
\hline
\end{tabular}}
\medskip
$^{{a}}$ Inaccurate Julian days, tabulated only as integers. $^{{b}}$ Less accurate Julian days, tabulated only to two~decimal digits.
  \end{table}