![]() |
Figure 1:
Isovelocity intensity maps computed with the SIMECA code, seen with an inclination angle of 45
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 2:
Intensity maps computed with the SIMECA code showing the formation of a ring ranging from 0 to 60 stellar radii by 10 R* steps. Seen pole-on ( upper row), at 45
![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 3:
Br![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 4: Visibilities for the ring model as a function of the baseline length for a baseline orientation along ( left) and perpendicular ( right) to the equatorial disk as a function of the disk dissipation. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 5: Spectral energy distribution (SED) as a function of the ring size, for the lower plain line: central star only, r=0 (dotted line), r=10 (dashed line), r=20 (dash-dotted line), r=30 (dash-dot-dot-dot line), r=40 (long-dash line), and for r= 50, 60 70 and 80 (plain line). Since the disk is nearly optically thin the SED is nearly independent of the inclination angle between the star rotation axis and the observer line of sight. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 6:
Intensity maps computed with the SIMECA code showing the vanishing of the circumstellar disk by decreasing the mass flux and thus the global mass loss rates:
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 7:
Br![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 8:
Spectral energy distribution (SED) as a function of the mass loss rate: only the central star (lower plain line),
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 9:
Br![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 10: Visibilities as a function of the baseline length for a baseline orientation along the equatorial disk as a function of the disk dissipation: following the ring model ( left) and the decreasing mass flux scenario ( right). |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 11: GG Tauri real part of the 1.4 mm continuum visibility as a function of the IRAM baseline length (dots with error bars) with a model (plain line) where 90% of the flux comes from a ring and the rest from an extended disk from Fig. 2 in Guilloteau et al. (1999). Note that this is the real part of the visibility (which can be negative!) whereas in our simulation we plotted the visibility modulus that is always between 0 and 1. The global shape of the visibility curve is the same as for our ring model from Fig. 3 seen pole-on. |
Open with DEXTER |