Table 3: Best-fit parameters to the EPIC spectra using a two components MEKAL model (Mewe et al. 1985) with variable abundance and with a hydrogen column density derived from the visual extinction.
                 
Source Id $N_{\rm H}$ Z $kT_{\rm cool}$ $EM_{\rm cool}$ $kT_{\rm hot}$ $EM_{\rm hot}$ $\chi ^{2}$
    (1020 cm2)   (keV) (1052cm-3) (keV) (1052cm-3)  
13 TTS 106 1.8 0.25 $\pm $ 0.05 0.79 $\pm $ 0.04 7.2 $\pm $ 3.2 1.6 $\pm $ 0.2 11.5 $\pm $ 2.5 1.00
24 SZ 96 8.9 0.06 $\pm $ 0.01 0.67 $\pm $ 0.02 37.8 $\pm $ 5.0 3.0 $\pm $ 0.2 14.1 $\pm $ 1.5 1.12
28 ParLup3-1/cc1 0.0 1.0 0.25 $\pm $ 0.05 2.4 $\pm $ 2.1 1.8 $\pm $ 0.4 2.2 $\pm $ 0.5 0.76
36 SZ 98 14.6 1.0 0.86 $\pm $ 0.09 0.4 $\pm $ 0.2 4.25 $\pm $ 0.92 3.8 $\pm $ 0.5 1.16
44 TTS 110 5.5 0.8 $\pm $ 0.4 0.64 $\pm $ 0.03 0.9 $\pm $ 0.7 2.3 $\pm $ 0.3 3.1 $\pm $ 1.0 1.02
74 SZ 108 0.0 0.4 $\pm $ 0.2 0.37 $\pm $ 0.06 0.9 $\pm $ 0.7 0.99 $\pm $ 0.09 1.0 $\pm $ 0.7 0.75
87 TTS 116 9.2 0.16 $\pm $ 0.02 0.59 $\pm $ 0.03 21.4 $\pm $ 4.4 1.17 $\pm $ 0.06 2.5 $\pm $ 0.4 1.15
92 SZ 114 9.2 0.12 $\pm $ 0.04 0.29 $\pm $ 0.03 7.8 $\pm $ 3.0 1.14 $\pm $ 0.08 10.3 $\pm $ 2.7 1.07

Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text