Table A.5: Detections and upper limits on the equivalent width of iron lines for 3C 273 (3EG J1229+0210). The continuum is best fitted with the broken power law model with Galactic absorbtion reported in Table A.3. Columns: (1) equivalent width [eV] for E=6.4 keV and $\sigma =0.15$ keV; (2) $\Delta \chi ^2$ with respect to the best fit continuum (2 d.o.f.); (3) equivalent width [eV] for E=6.4 keV and $\sigma =0.5$ keV; (4) $\Delta \chi ^2$ with respect to the best fit continuum (2 d.o.f.); (5) equivalent width [eV] for E=6.7 keV and $\sigma =0.15$ keV; (6) $\Delta \chi ^2$ with respect to the best fit continuum (2 d.o.f.); (7) equivalent width [eV] for E=6.7 keV and $\sigma =0.5$ keV; (8) $\Delta \chi ^2$ with respect to the best fit continuum (2 d.o.f.); The uncertainties in the parameters and upper limits estimate are at the $90\%$ confidence limits for 1 parameter.
E=6.4 keV E=6.7 keV
$\sigma =0.15$ keV $\Delta \chi ^2$ $\sigma =0.5$ keV $\Delta \chi ^2$ $\sigma =0.15$ keV $\Delta \chi ^2$ $\sigma =0.5$ keV $\Delta \chi ^2$
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8)
$\rm 29_{-12}^{+13}$ 14.3 $54.5\pm 0.1$ 20.2 $18.4\pm 0.1$ 5.2 $39.3\pm 0.1$ 7.7
<16 - <50 - <28 - <53 -
<19 - <62 - $31\pm 19$ 7.2 <64 -
$\rm 20_{-12}^{+13}$ 7.0 $\rm 46_{-15}^{+33}$ 16.0 $\rm 21_{-14}^{+13}$ 6.4 $\rm 62_{-36}^{+15}$ 12.5
<20 - $\rm 38_{-13}^{+27}$ 16.2 $22\pm 11$ 10.8 $\rm 48_{-28}^{+13}$ 12.0
<37 - <59 - <46 - <83 -
<56 - <87 - <30 - <95 -
<38 - <105 - <41 - <113 -
$\rm 44_{-37}^{+40}$ 3.3 <117 - <42 - <133 -
<62 - $\rm 80_{-67}^{+49}$ 4.1 $\rm 64_{-37}^{+34}$ 8.6 $\rm 110_{-83}^{+44}$ 5.8
<52 - <144 - <75 - <156 -
<42 - <111 - <60 - <112 -
<60 - <106 - $\rm 43_{-35}^{+34}$ 4.1 <92 -
<40 - <97 - <55 - <125 -
<40 - $\rm 33_{-26}^{+68}$ 3.8 <47 - $\rm 33_{-27}^{+74}$ 3.7


Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text