Table 3: Best fit model parameters for the 15 AGN from the BeppoSAX catalogs by Giommi et al. (2002) and Donato et al. (2005). The values are the weighted averages obtained from multiple observations (if any) and from the two catalogs. In the case of 3C 273 (3EG J1229-0210) there were 9 observations, 5 best fitted with a broken power law and 4 with a single power law model: both model averages are reported. For NGC 6251 (3EG J1621+8203) the average is obtained from Chiaberge et al. (2003) and Guainazzi et al. (2003) from a fit in the energy band 0.1-200 keV. Grandi et al. (2003) is the reference for Cen A (3EG J1324-4314), from a fit in the energy band 0.4-250 keV excluding the 5.5-7.5 keV band (iron emission line). The value for PKS 1830-211 (3EG J1832-2110) has been obtained by De Rosa et al. (2005) from a fit in the energy band 0.5-80 keV (Chandra and INTEGRAL). Columns: (1) name of the source; (2) absorbing column density [1020 cm-2]; (3) photon index $\Gamma $, if the best fit is a simple power law model or soft photon index $\Gamma _1$, if the best fit model is a broken power law; (4) hard photon index $\Gamma _2$ for the broken power law model; (5) break energy [keV].
Name $N_{{\rm H}}$ $\Gamma $/$\Gamma _1$ $\Gamma _2$ $E_{\rm break}$
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
0219+428 Gal. $2.22\pm 0.06$ - -
AO 0235+164 Gal. $2.0\pm 0.1$ - -
PKS 0521-365 Gal. $1.74\pm 0.02$ - -
S5 0716+714 Gal. $2.5\pm 0.2$ $1.8\pm 0.1$ $3.0\pm 0.4$
S5 0836+710 $\rm 78_{-35}^{+55}$ $1.31\pm 0.02$ - -
Mkn 421 Gal. $1.9\pm 0.2$ $2.3\pm 0.3$ $1.3\pm 0.8$
PKS 1127-145 Gal. $1.42\pm 0.05$ - -
ON 231 Gal. $2.58\pm 0.01$ $1.52\pm 0.06$ $2.8\pm 0.2$
3C 273 Gal. $2.0\pm 0.1$ $1.603\pm 0.006$ $0.9\pm 0.3$
  Gal. $1.58\pm 0.03$ - -
Cen A $\rm 1020_{-40}^{+90}$ $\rm 1.80_{-0.04}^{+0.03}$ - -
PKS 1334-127 - - - -
PKS 1406-076 - - - -
NGC 6251 $9\pm 1$ $1.79\pm 0.06$ - -
PKS 1830-211 $\rm 194_{-25}^{+28}$ $1.09\pm 0.05$ - -
PKS 2155-304 Gal. $2.3\pm 0.1$ $2.8\pm 0.1$ $1.7\pm 0.2$


Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text