All Tables

Table 1: UC H II fields observed during the survey, their central coordinates and estimated distance to the UC H IIs in each field. Fields indicated with a dagger ( $^{\dag }$ ) show no evidence for UC H II regions in the WC89a and KCW94 surveys, or in the literature search described in Sect. 2.1. Fields indicated by an asterisk (^*) were subject to the 450 $\mu$ m calibration problems described in Sect. 2.3. In cases where there is an ambiguity between the near and far kinematic distance both values are listed. Where the distance to the UC H II in the field is not known or there is no known UC H II in the field an ellipsis is given.
Table 3: SCUBA fields from the survey with no detected sub-mm emission (to a level of 3 $\sigma$ ). Fields indicated with a dagger ( $^{\dag }$ ) show no evidence for UC H II regions in the WC89a and KCW94 surveys, or in the literature search described in Sect. 2.1.
Table 4: Ultracompact radio components in the survey fields with undetected sub-mm emission to a level of 3 $\sigma$ . The radio sources are indicated by their SIMBAD identifier; [WC89] for the WC89a survey; [KCW94] for the KCW94 survey, [GPSR5] for the Becker et al. (1994) 5GHz Galactic Plane survey; [GPSR] for the Becker et al. (1990) and Zoonematkermani et al. (1990) 1.4 GHz Galactic Plane survey and [GBH05] for the work of Giveon et al. (2005). Upper limits to the clump mass have been calculated from the 850 $\mu$ m flux upper limit using the assumptions outlined in Sect. 4.1. An ellipsis is given for those radio components of unknown distance while for objects with distance ambiguities both near and far distances and clump masses are given.
Table 2: Identifications, coordinates, peak and integrated fluxes of each submillimetre source detected in the survey. Multiple sources located in a single jiggle-map are indicated by labels following the UC H II region field name. These labels are the same as those used in Figs. 1 and 2. 450 $\mu$ m peak flux measurements indicated by a dagger ( $^{\dag }$ ) are measured from smoothed images and the flux density unit in this case is Janskys per 14 $^{\prime \prime }$ beam. The resolution of the unsmoothed images is 8 $^{\prime \prime }$ at 450 $\mu$ m and 14 $^{\prime \prime }$ at 850 $\mu$ m. Upper limits for non-detections at 450 $\mu$ m are indicated. Where it was not possible to measure a 450 $\mu$ m flux, either due to the smaller FOV of the short wavelength array or calibration problems this is indicated by an ellipsis (...). Quoted errors include calibration uncertainties of 30% at 450 $\mu$ m and 10% at 850 $\mu$ m. All source positions were measured from the 850 $\mu$ m images unless otherwise stated.