Table 2: $\it UBV$ photometry of red giant candidates.
Star V $\sigma$ B-V $\sigma$ U-B $\sigma$ n1
NGC 6192              
4 11.588 6 1.334 15 1.161 4 3
9 11.430 8 1.510 16 1.876 34 2
28 10.663 8 1.991 8 2.339 24 2
45 11.743 3 1.546 13 1.481 33 2
91 11.207 1 1.632 10 1.388 11 2
96 11.306 6 1.502 12 1.341 20 2
137a 11.223 7 1.758 8 1.633 4 3
253 11.130 9 1.111 10 0.749 10 2
255b 11.945 10 1.597 16 1.363 11 3
265b 11.849 29 1.451 3 1.323 10 2
274b 11.300 13 1.650 13 1.512 13 3
NGC 6208              
9 12.563 12 1.386 11 1.405 45 2
19a 11.111 26 1.308 19 1.045 16 3
20a 12.449 14 1.394 19 1.316 31 3
27 11.151 7 1.265 4 0.873 1 2
31 11.643 10 1.203 17 0.882 9 3
44c 12.907 18 0.958 8 0.347 33 3
48 11.632 19 1.325 17 1.098 11 3
119 12.616 10 1.815 21 2.124 80 5
124 12.309 22 1.363 5 1.232 12 3
127c 12.927 28 1.469 23 1.377 84 3
132 14.586 15 2.169 53     2
133 11.575 1 1.331 2 1.328 22 2
150 12.461 19 1.375 7 1.152 15 2
165a 12.804 13 1.707 15 1.804 65 2
166 12.158 16 1.253 2 1.023 30 2
178c 13.093 12 1.375 8 1.169 78 3
179 12.987 15 1.471 12 1.535 63 3
209 12.575 9 0.644 12 0.125 16 3
267 12.550 29 1.646 24 1.716 70 2
NGC 6268              
13 10.415 5 1.242 3 0.979 13 2
22 10.811 27 1.435 2 1.181 15 2
35 10.349 7 1.685 23 1.669 3 2
44 9.965 25 1.395 9 1.137 5 2
48 11.311 17 1,218 5 1.016 5 2
73 11.189 23 1.465 7 1.380 1 2
76c 9.749 15 1.394 15 1.075 15 2
a Double star, only the bright component was measured.
b Star identified in Fig. 1.
c Double star, both components were measured together.

Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text