Table 2: Journal of TBL observations, with epochs, exposure times and a comparison (O-C) between the measured radial velocities ( $v_{\rm r, O}$) and predicted radial velocities ( $v_{\rm r, C}$) based on the ephemeris and amplitudes of Paper III. Note that these values correspond reasonably well, provided that a constant difference of $14\pm 1$ km s-1 for the system velocity is taken into account.
Nr.DateMid HJD Exp. $v_{\rm r, O}$ $v_{\rm r, C}$ O-C
  -2 450 000 s km s-1 km s-1 km s-1
1a2003 Feb. 82679.300 600 -9.7 -20.5 10.8
1b 2679.308 600 -0.9 -11.7 10.8
1c 2679.316 600 7.4 -2.3 9.7
1d 2679.323 600 16.7 6.1 10.6
2a2003 Oct. 252937.530 900 22.4 8.2 14.2
2b 2937.548 900 31.2 16.6 14.6
2c 2937.559 900 36.6 23.1 13.5
2d 2937.570 900 43.4 31.5 11.9
3a2004 Feb. 43040.452 750 19.5 1.6 17.9
3b 3040.461 750 14.3 -0.1 14.4
3c 3040.471 750 12.3 1.6 10.7
3d 3040.480 750 15.4 2.5 12.9
4a2004 Feb. 63042.412 750 -3.3 -16.6 13.3
4b 3042.421 750 -6.6 -19.0 12.4
4c 3042.430 750 -7.6 -20.7 13.1
4d 3042.439 750 -6.8 -19.5 12.7
5a2004 Feb. 83044.445 750 50.5 27.8 22.7
5b 3044.454 750 45.5 21.3 24.2
5c 3044.464 750 32.3 10.1 22.2
5d 3044.473 750 12.4 -3.5 15.9
6a2004 Feb. 103046.289 750 0.7 -10.5 11.2
6b 3046.298 750 8.3 -1.4 9.7
6c 3046.308 750 15.9 8.0 7.9
6d 3046.317 750 23.4 14.5 8.9
7a2004 Feb. 123048.413 750 27.6 14.2 13.4
7b 3048.422 750 29.5 14.4 15.1
7c 3048.431 750 30.9 14.9 16.0
7d 3048.441 750 33.5 18.2 15.3
8a2004 Feb. 143050.272 750 9.8 -6.6 16.4
8b 3050.282 750 13.6 -1.9 15.5
8c 3050.291 750 18.3 3.6 14.7
8d 3050.300 750 23.2 8.8 14.4

Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text